mirror/libbpf
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netdata/libbpf.git synced 2026-04-04 07:39:07 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

libbpf: Fix some typos in comments

Browse Source 
Fix some spelling errors in the code comments of libbpf:

betwen -> between
paremeters -> parameters
knowning -> knowing
definiton -> definition
compatiblity -> compatibility
overriden -> overridden
occured -> occurred
proccess -> process
managment -> management
nessary -> necessary

Signed-off-by: Yusheng Zheng <yunwei356@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240909225952.30324-1-yunwei356@gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
Yusheng Zheng
2024-09-09 22:59:52 +00:00
committed by Andrii Nakryiko
parent 81ac790dc8
commit e1833cff9c
8 changed files with 13 additions and 13 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
src/bpf_helpers.h
View File

@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ extern void bpf_iter_num_destroy(struct bpf_iter_num *it) __weak __ksym;
* I.e., it looks almost like high-level for each loop in other languages,
* supports continue/break, and is verifiable by BPF verifier.
*
* For iterating integers, the difference betwen bpf_for_each(num, i, N, M)
* For iterating integers, the difference between bpf_for_each(num, i, N, M)
* and bpf_for(i, N, M) is in that bpf_for() provides additional proof to
* verifier that i is in [N, M) range, and in bpf_for_each() case i is `int
* *`, not just `int`. So for integers bpf_for() is more convenient.