This change adds support for attaching uprobes to shared objects located
in APKs, which is relevant for Android systems where various libraries
may reside in APKs. To make that happen, we extend the syntax for the
"binary path" argument to attach to with that supported by various
Android tools:
<archive>!/<binary-in-archive>
For example:
/system/app/test-app/test-app.apk!/lib/arm64-v8a/libc++_shared.so
APKs need to be specified via full path, i.e., we do not attempt to
resolve mere file names by searching system directories.
We cannot currently test this functionality end-to-end in an automated
fashion, because it relies on an Android system being present, but there
is no support for that in CI. I have tested the functionality manually,
by creating a libbpf program containing a uretprobe, attaching it to a
function inside a shared object inside an APK, and verifying the sanity
of the returned values.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230301212308.1839139-4-deso@posteo.net
This change splits the elf_find_func_offset() function in two:
elf_find_func_offset(), which now accepts an already opened Elf object
instead of a path to a file that is to be opened, as well as
elf_find_func_offset_from_file(), which opens a binary based on a
path and then invokes elf_find_func_offset() on the Elf object. Having
this split in responsibilities will allow us to call
elf_find_func_offset() from other code paths on Elf objects that did not
necessarily come from a file on disk.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230301212308.1839139-3-deso@posteo.net
This change implements support for reading zip archives, including
opening an archive, finding an entry based on its path and name in it,
and closing it.
The code was copied from https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/pull/4440, which
implements similar functionality for bcc. The author confirmed that he
is fine with this usage and the corresponding relicensing. I adjusted it
to adhere to libbpf coding standards.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Michał Gregorczyk <michalgr@meta.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230301212308.1839139-2-deso@posteo.net
Two new kfuncs are added, bpf_dynptr_slice and bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr.
The user must pass in a buffer to store the contents of the data slice
if a direct pointer to the data cannot be obtained.
For skb and xdp type dynptrs, these two APIs are the only way to obtain
a data slice. However, for other types of dynptrs, there is no
difference between bpf_dynptr_slice(_rdwr) and bpf_dynptr_data.
For skb type dynptrs, the data is copied into the user provided buffer
if any of the data is not in the linear portion of the skb. For xdp type
dynptrs, the data is copied into the user provided buffer if the data is
between xdp frags.
If the skb is cloned and a call to bpf_dynptr_data_rdwr is made, then
the skb will be uncloned (see bpf_unclone_prologue()).
Please note that any bpf_dynptr_write() automatically invalidates any prior
data slices of the skb dynptr. This is because the skb may be cloned or
may need to pull its paged buffer into the head. As such, any
bpf_dynptr_write() will automatically have its prior data slices
invalidated, even if the write is to data in the skb head of an uncloned
skb. Please note as well that any other helper calls that change the
underlying packet buffer (eg bpf_skb_pull_data()) invalidates any data
slices of the skb dynptr as well, for the same reasons.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301154953.641654-10-joannelkoong@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Add xdp dynptrs, which are dynptrs whose underlying pointer points
to a xdp_buff. The dynptr acts on xdp data. xdp dynptrs have two main
benefits. One is that they allow operations on sizes that are not
statically known at compile-time (eg variable-sized accesses).
Another is that parsing the packet data through dynptrs (instead of
through direct access of xdp->data and xdp->data_end) can be more
ergonomic and less brittle (eg does not need manual if checking for
being within bounds of data_end).
For reads and writes on the dynptr, this includes reading/writing
from/to and across fragments. Data slices through the bpf_dynptr_data
API are not supported; instead bpf_dynptr_slice() and
bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr() should be used.
For examples of how xdp dynptrs can be used, please see the attached
selftests.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301154953.641654-9-joannelkoong@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Add skb dynptrs, which are dynptrs whose underlying pointer points
to a skb. The dynptr acts on skb data. skb dynptrs have two main
benefits. One is that they allow operations on sizes that are not
statically known at compile-time (eg variable-sized accesses).
Another is that parsing the packet data through dynptrs (instead of
through direct access of skb->data and skb->data_end) can be more
ergonomic and less brittle (eg does not need manual if checking for
being within bounds of data_end).
For bpf prog types that don't support writes on skb data, the dynptr is
read-only (bpf_dynptr_write() will return an error)
For reads and writes through the bpf_dynptr_read() and bpf_dynptr_write()
interfaces, reading and writing from/to data in the head as well as from/to
non-linear paged buffers is supported. Data slices through the
bpf_dynptr_data API are not supported; instead bpf_dynptr_slice() and
bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr() (added in subsequent commit) should be used.
For examples of how skb dynptrs can be used, please see the attached
selftests.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301154953.641654-8-joannelkoong@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Fix a repeated copy/paste typo.
Fixes: d3d854fd6a1d ("netdev-genl: create a simple family for netdev stuff")
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Commit 04d58f1b26a4("libbpf: add API to get XDP/XSK supported features")
added feature_flags to struct bpf_xdp_query_opts. If a user uses
bpf_xdp_query_opts with feature_flags member, the bpf_xdp_query()
will check whether 'netdev' family exists or not in the kernel.
If it does not exist, the bpf_xdp_query() will return -ENOENT.
But 'netdev' family does not exist in old kernels as it is
introduced in the same patch set as Commit 04d58f1b26a4.
So old kernel with newer libbpf won't work properly with
bpf_xdp_query() api call.
To fix this issue, if the return value of
libbpf_netlink_resolve_genl_family_id() is -ENOENT, bpf_xdp_query()
will just return 0, skipping the rest of xdp feature query.
This preserves backward compatibility.
Fixes: 04d58f1b26a4 ("libbpf: add API to get XDP/XSK supported features")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230227224943.1153459-1-yhs@fb.com
The syscall register definitions for ARM in bpf_tracing.h doesn't define
the fifth parameter for the syscalls. Because of this some KPROBES based
selftests fail to compile for ARM architecture.
Define the fifth parameter that is passed in the R5 register (uregs[4]).
Fixes: 3a95c42d65d5 ("libbpf: Define arm syscall regs spec in bpf_tracing.h")
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230223095346.10129-1-puranjay12@gmail.com
The bpf_fib_lookup() also looks up the neigh table.
This was done before bpf_redirect_neigh() was added.
In the use case that does not manage the neigh table
and requires bpf_fib_lookup() to lookup a fib to
decide if it needs to redirect or not, the bpf prog can
depend only on using bpf_redirect_neigh() to lookup the
neigh. It also keeps the neigh entries fresh and connected.
This patch adds a bpf_fib_lookup flag, SKIP_NEIGH, to avoid
the double neigh lookup when the bpf prog always call
bpf_redirect_neigh() to do the neigh lookup. The params->smac
output is skipped together when SKIP_NEIGH is set because
bpf_redirect_neigh() will figure out the smac also.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230217205515.3583372-1-martin.lau@linux.dev
This patch adds special BPF_RB_{ROOT,NODE} btf_field_types similar to
BPF_LIST_{HEAD,NODE}, adds the necessary plumbing to detect the new
types, and adds bpf_rb_root_free function for freeing bpf_rb_root in
map_values.
structs bpf_rb_root and bpf_rb_node are opaque types meant to
obscure structs rb_root_cached rb_node, respectively.
btf_struct_access will prevent BPF programs from touching these special
fields automatically now that they're recognized.
btf_check_and_fixup_fields now groups list_head and rb_root together as
"graph root" fields and {list,rb}_node as "graph node", and does same
ownership cycle checking as before. Note that this function does _not_
prevent ownership type mixups (e.g. rb_root owning list_node) - that's
handled by btf_parse_graph_root.
After this patch, a bpf program can have a struct bpf_rb_root in a
map_value, but not add anything to nor do anything useful with it.
Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230214004017.2534011-2-davemarchevsky@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The code assumes that everything that comes after nlmsgerr are nlattrs.
When calculating their size, it does not account for the initial
nlmsghdr. This may lead to accessing uninitialized memory.
Fixes: bbf48c18ee0c ("libbpf: add error reporting in XDP")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230210001210.395194-8-iii@linux.ibm.com
Add option to set when the perf buffer should wake up, by default the
perf buffer becomes signaled for every event that is being pushed to it.
In case of a high throughput of events it will be more efficient to wake
up only once you have X events ready to be read.
So your application can wakeup once and drain the entire perf buffer.
Signed-off-by: Jon Doron <jond@wiz.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230207081916.3398417-1-arilou@gmail.com
In a previous commit, Ubuntu kernel code version is correctly set
by retrieving the information from /proc/version_signature.
commit<5b3d72987701d51bf31823b39db49d10970f5c2d>
(libbpf: Improve LINUX_VERSION_CODE detection)
The /proc/version_signature file doesn't present in at least the
older versions of Debian distributions (eg, Debian 9, 10). The Debian
kernel has a similar issue where the release information from uname()
syscall doesn't give the kernel code version that matches what the
kernel actually expects. Below is an example content from Debian 10.
release: 4.19.0-23-amd64
version: #1 SMP Debian 4.19.269-1 (2022-12-20) x86_64
Debian reports incorrect kernel version in utsname::release returned
by uname() syscall, which in older kernels (Debian 9, 10) leads to
kprobe BPF programs failing to load due to the version check mismatch.
Fortunately, the correct kernel code version presents in the
utsname::version returned by uname() syscall in Debian kernels. This
change adds another get kernel version function to handle Debian in
addition to the previously added get kernel version function to handle
Ubuntu. Some minor refactoring work is also done to make the code more
readable.
Signed-off-by: Hao Xiang <hao.xiang@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang <horenchuang@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230203234842.2933903-1-hao.xiang@bytedance.com
Loading programs that use bpf_usdt_arg() on s390x fails with:
; if (arg_num >= BPF_USDT_MAX_ARG_CNT || arg_num >= spec->arg_cnt)
128: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -24) ; frame1: R1_w=scalar(umax=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R10=fp0
129: (25) if r1 > 0xb goto pc+83 ; frame1: R1_w=scalar(umax=11,var_off=(0x0; 0xf))
...
; arg_spec = &spec->args[arg_num];
135: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -24) ; frame1: R1_w=scalar(umax=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R10=fp0
...
; switch (arg_spec->arg_type) {
139: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r2 +8)
R2 unbounded memory access, make sure to bounds check any such access
The reason is that, even though the C code enforces that
arg_num < BPF_USDT_MAX_ARG_CNT, the verifier cannot propagate this
constraint to the arg_spec assignment yet. Help it by forcing r1 back
to stack after comparison.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230128000650.1516334-23-iii@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
