riscv registers are accessed via struct user_regs_struct, not struct
pt_regs. The program counter member in this struct is called pc, not
epc. The frame pointer is called s0, not fp.
Fixes: 3cc31d794097 ("libbpf: Normalize PT_REGS_xxx() macro definitions")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220209021745.2215452-6-iii@linux.ibm.com
Refactor PT_REGS macros definitions in bpf_tracing.h to avoid excessive
duplication. We currently have classic PT_REGS_xxx() and CO-RE-enabled
PT_REGS_xxx_CORE(). We are about to add also _SYSCALL variants, which
would require excessive copying of all the per-architecture definitions.
Instead, separate architecture-specific field/register names from the
final macro that utilize them. That way for upcoming _SYSCALL variants
we'll be able to just define x86_64 exception and otherwise have one
common set of _SYSCALL macro definitions common for all architectures.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211222213924.1869758-1-andrii@kernel.org
bpf2go is the Go equivalent of libbpf skeleton. The convention is that
the compiled BPF is checked into the repository to facilitate distributing
BPF as part of Go packages. To make this portable, bpf2go by default
generates both bpfel and bpfeb variants of the C.
Using bpf_tracing.h is inherently non-portable since the fields of
struct pt_regs differ between platforms, so CO-RE can't help us here.
The only way of working around this is to compile for each target
platform independently. bpf2go can't do this by default since there
are too many platforms.
Define the various PT_... macros when no target can be determined and
turn them into compilation failures. This works because bpf2go always
compiles for bpf targets, so the compiler fallback doesn't kick in.
Conditionally define __BPF_MISSING_TARGET so that we can inject a
more appropriate error message at build time. The user can then
choose which platform to target explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210616083635.11434-1-lmb@cloudflare.com
These macros are convenient wrappers around the bpf_seq_printf and
bpf_snprintf helpers. They are currently provided by bpf_tracing.h which
targets low level tracing primitives. bpf_helpers.h is a better fit.
The __bpf_narg and __bpf_apply are needed in both files and provided
twice. __bpf_empty isn't used anywhere and is removed from bpf_tracing.h
Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210526164643.2881368-1-revest@chromium.org
When initializing the __param array with a one liner, if all args are
const, the initial array value will be placed in the rodata section but
because libbpf does not support relocation in the rodata section, any
pointer in this array will stay NULL.
Fixes: c09add2fbc5a ("tools/libbpf: Add bpf_iter support")
Signed-off-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210419155243.1632274-5-revest@chromium.org
Two new libbpf APIs are added to support bpf_iter:
- bpf_program__attach_iter
Given a bpf program and additional parameters, which is
none now, returns a bpf_link.
- bpf_iter_create
syscall level API to create a bpf iterator.
The macro BPF_SEQ_PRINTF are also introduced. The format
looks like:
BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "task id %d\n", pid);
This macro can help bpf program writers with
nicer bpf_seq_printf syntax similar to the kernel one.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200509175917.2476936-1-yhs@fb.com
Syscall raw tracepoints have struct pt_regs pointer as tracepoint's first
argument. After that, reading any of pt_regs fields requires bpf_probe_read(),
even for tp_btf programs. Due to that, PT_REGS_PARMx macros are not usable as
is. This patch adds CO-RE variants of those macros that use BPF_CORE_READ() to
read necessary fields. This provides relocatable architecture-agnostic pt_regs
field accesses.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200313172336.1879637-4-andriin@fb.com
Add detection of vmlinux.h to bpf_tracing.h header for PT_REGS macro.
Currently, BPF applications have to define __KERNEL__ symbol to use correct
definition of struct pt_regs on x86 arch. This is due to different field names
under internal kernel vs UAPI conditions. To make this more transparent for
users, detect vmlinux.h by checking __VMLINUX_H__ symbol.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200229231112.1240137-3-andriin@fb.com
