Ihor Solodrai
2025-04-02 08:45:12 -07:00
committed by Andrii Nakryiko
parent 374036c9f1
commit 1b8768339f
3 changed files with 211 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
From bd06a13f44e15e2e83561ea165061c445a15bd9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 11:55:28 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 4000/4002] selftests/bpf: Fix tests after fields reorder in
struct file
The change in struct file [1] moved f_ref to the 3rd cache line.
It made *(u64 *)file dereference invalid from the verifier point of view,
because btf_struct_walk() walks into f_lock field, which is 4-byte long.
Fix the selftests to deference the file pointer as a 4-byte access.
[1] commit e249056c91a2 ("fs: place f_ref to 3rd cache line in struct file to resolve false sharing")
Reported-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250327185528.1740787-1-song@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_subprogs_extable.c | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c
index fb07f5773888..7f3c233943b3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(handle_fexit_ret, int arg, struct file *ret)
bpf_probe_read_kernel(&buf, 8, ret);
bpf_probe_read_kernel(&buf, 8, (char *)ret + 256);
- *(volatile long long *)ret;
+ *(volatile int *)ret;
*(volatile int *)&ret->f_mode;
return 0;
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_subprogs_extable.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_subprogs_extable.c
index e2a21fbd4e44..dcac69f5928a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_subprogs_extable.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_subprogs_extable.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ static __u64 test_cb(struct bpf_map *map, __u32 *key, __u64 *val, void *data)
SEC("fexit/bpf_testmod_return_ptr")
int BPF_PROG(handle_fexit_ret_subprogs, int arg, struct file *ret)
{
- *(volatile long *)ret;
+ *(volatile int *)ret;
*(volatile int *)&ret->f_mode;
bpf_for_each_map_elem(&test_array, test_cb, NULL, 0);
triggered++;
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(handle_fexit_ret_subprogs, int arg, struct file *ret)
SEC("fexit/bpf_testmod_return_ptr")
int BPF_PROG(handle_fexit_ret_subprogs2, int arg, struct file *ret)
{
- *(volatile long *)ret;
+ *(volatile int *)ret;
*(volatile int *)&ret->f_mode;
bpf_for_each_map_elem(&test_array, test_cb, NULL, 0);
triggered++;
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(handle_fexit_ret_subprogs2, int arg, struct file *ret)
SEC("fexit/bpf_testmod_return_ptr")
int BPF_PROG(handle_fexit_ret_subprogs3, int arg, struct file *ret)
{
- *(volatile long *)ret;
+ *(volatile int *)ret;
*(volatile int *)&ret->f_mode;
bpf_for_each_map_elem(&test_array, test_cb, NULL, 0);
triggered++;
--
2.49.0

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
From 8be3a12f9f266aaf3f06f0cfe0e90cfe4d956f3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 12:31:24 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 4001/4002] selftests/bpf: Fix verifier_bpf_fastcall test
Commit [1] moves percpu data on x86 from address 0x000... to address
0xfff...
Before [1]:
159020: 0000000000030700 0 OBJECT GLOBAL DEFAULT 23 pcpu_hot
After [1]:
152602: ffffffff83a3e034 4 OBJECT GLOBAL DEFAULT 35 pcpu_hot
As a result, verifier_bpf_fastcall tests should now expect a negative
value for pcpu_hot, IOW, the disassemble should show "r=" instead of
"w=".
Fix this in the test.
Note that, a later change created a new variable "cpu_number" for
bpf_get_smp_processor_id() [2]. The inlining logic is updated properly
as part of this change, so there is no need to fix anything on the
kernel side.
[1] commit 9d7de2aa8b41 ("x86/percpu/64: Use relative percpu offsets")
[2] commit 01c7bc5198e9 ("x86/smp: Move cpu number to percpu hot section")
Reported-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250328193124.808784-1-song@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bpf_fastcall.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bpf_fastcall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bpf_fastcall.c
index a9be6ae49454..c258b0722e04 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bpf_fastcall.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bpf_fastcall.c
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ SEC("raw_tp")
__arch_x86_64
__log_level(4) __msg("stack depth 8")
__xlated("4: r5 = 5")
-__xlated("5: w0 = ")
+__xlated("5: r0 = ")
__xlated("6: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)")
__xlated("7: r0 = *(u32 *)(r0 +0)")
__xlated("8: exit")
@@ -704,7 +704,7 @@ SEC("raw_tp")
__arch_x86_64
__log_level(4) __msg("stack depth 32+0")
__xlated("2: r1 = 1")
-__xlated("3: w0 =")
+__xlated("3: r0 =")
__xlated("4: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)")
__xlated("5: r0 = *(u32 *)(r0 +0)")
/* bpf_loop params setup */
@@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ __arch_x86_64
__log_level(4) __msg("stack depth 40+0")
/* call bpf_get_smp_processor_id */
__xlated("2: r1 = 42")
-__xlated("3: w0 =")
+__xlated("3: r0 =")
__xlated("4: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)")
__xlated("5: r0 = *(u32 *)(r0 +0)")
/* call bpf_get_prandom_u32 */
--
2.49.0

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
From 07be1f644ff9eeb842fd0490ddd824df0828cb0e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 20:38:28 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 4002/4002] selftests/bpf: Fix verifier_private_stack test
failure
Several verifier_private_stack tests failed with latest bpf-next.
For example, for 'Private stack, single prog' subtest, the
jitted code:
func #0:
0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64
4: 0f 1f 44 00 00 nopl (%rax,%rax)
9: 0f 1f 00 nopl (%rax)
c: 55 pushq %rbp
d: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp
10: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64
14: 49 b9 58 74 8a 8f 7d 60 00 00 movabsq $0x607d8f8a7458, %r9
1e: 65 4c 03 0c 25 28 c0 48 87 addq %gs:-0x78b73fd8, %r9
27: bf 2a 00 00 00 movl $0x2a, %edi
2c: 49 89 b9 00 ff ff ff movq %rdi, -0x100(%r9)
33: 31 c0 xorl %eax, %eax
35: c9 leave
36: e9 20 5d 0f e1 jmp 0xffffffffe10f5d5b
The insn 'addq %gs:-0x78b73fd8, %r9' does not match the expected
regex 'addq %gs:0x{{.*}}, %r9' and this caused test failure.
Fix it by changing '%gs:0x{{.*}}' to '%gs:{{.*}}' to accommodate the
possible negative offset. A few other subtests are fixed in a similar way.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250331033828.365077-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c
index b1fbdf119553..fc91b414364e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ __description("Private stack, single prog")
__success
__arch_x86_64
__jited(" movabsq $0x{{.*}}, %r9")
-__jited(" addq %gs:0x{{.*}}, %r9")
+__jited(" addq %gs:{{.*}}, %r9")
__jited(" movl $0x2a, %edi")
__jited(" movq %rdi, -0x100(%r9)")
__naked void private_stack_single_prog(void)
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ __success
__arch_x86_64
/* private stack fp for the main prog */
__jited(" movabsq $0x{{.*}}, %r9")
-__jited(" addq %gs:0x{{.*}}, %r9")
+__jited(" addq %gs:{{.*}}, %r9")
__jited(" movl $0x2a, %edi")
__jited(" movq %rdi, -0x200(%r9)")
__jited(" pushq %r9")
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ __jited(" pushq %rbp")
__jited(" movq %rsp, %rbp")
__jited(" endbr64")
__jited(" movabsq $0x{{.*}}, %r9")
-__jited(" addq %gs:0x{{.*}}, %r9")
+__jited(" addq %gs:{{.*}}, %r9")
__jited(" pushq %r9")
__jited(" callq")
__jited(" popq %r9")
--
2.49.0