Commit Graph
6 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Eduard Zingerman 4218389b1e libbpf: Fix double-free when linker processes empty sections
Double-free error in bpf_linker__free() was reported by James Hilliard.
The error is caused by miss-use of realloc() in extend_sec().
The error occurs when two files with empty sections of the same name
are linked:
- when first file is processed:
  - extend_sec() calls realloc(dst->raw_data, dst_align_sz)
    with dst->raw_data == NULL and dst_align_sz == 0;
  - dst->raw_data is set to a special pointer to a memory block of
    size zero;
- when second file is processed:
  - extend_sec() calls realloc(dst->raw_data, dst_align_sz)
    with dst->raw_data == <special pointer> and dst_align_sz == 0;
  - realloc() "frees" dst->raw_data special pointer and returns NULL;
  - extend_sec() exits with -ENOMEM, and the old dst->raw_data value
    is preserved (it is now invalid);
  - eventually, bpf_linker__free() attempts to free dst->raw_data again.

This patch fixes the bug by avoiding -ENOMEM exit for dst_align_sz == 0.
The fix was suggested by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>.

Reported-by: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Tested-by: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CADvTj4o7ZWUikKwNTwFq0O_AaX+46t_+Ca9gvWMYdWdRtTGeHQ@mail.gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230328004738.381898-3-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
2023-03-30 16:24:24 -07:00
Eduard Zingerman e1b34c589d libbpf: Hashmap.h update to fix build issues using LLVM14
A fix for the LLVM compilation error while building bpftool.
Replaces the expression:

  _Static_assert((p) == NULL || ...)

by expression:

  _Static_assert((__builtin_constant_p((p)) ? (p) == NULL : 0) || ...)

When "p" is not a constant the former is not considered to be a
constant expression by LLVM 14.

The error was introduced in the following patch-set: [1].
The error was reported here: [2].

  [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221109142611.879983-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/
  [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/202211110355.BcGcbZxP-lkp@intel.com/

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Fixes: c302378bc157 ("libbpf: Hashmap interface update to allow both long and void* keys/values")
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221110223240.1350810-1-eddyz87@gmail.com
2022-11-12 18:24:12 -08:00
Eduard Zingerman 7583310911 libbpf: Resolve unambigous forward declarations
Resolve forward declarations that don't take part in type graphs
comparisons if declaration name is unambiguous. Example:

CU #1:

struct foo;              // standalone forward declaration
struct foo *some_global;

CU #2:

struct foo { int x; };
struct foo *another_global;

The `struct foo` from CU #1 is not a part of any definition that is
compared against another definition while `btf_dedup_struct_types`
processes structural types. The the BTF after `btf_dedup_struct_types`
the BTF looks as follows:

[1] STRUCT 'foo' size=4 vlen=1 ...
[2] INT 'int' size=4 ...
[3] PTR '(anon)' type_id=1
[4] FWD 'foo' fwd_kind=struct
[5] PTR '(anon)' type_id=4

This commit adds a new pass `btf_dedup_resolve_fwds`, that maps such
forward declarations to structs or unions with identical name in case
if the name is not ambiguous.

The pass is positioned before `btf_dedup_ref_types` so that types
[3] and [5] could be merged as a same type after [1] and [4] are merged.
The final result for the example above looks as follows:

[1] STRUCT 'foo' size=4 vlen=1
	'x' type_id=2 bits_offset=0
[2] INT 'int' size=4 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED
[3] PTR '(anon)' type_id=1

For defconfig kernel with BTF enabled this removes 63 forward
declarations. Examples of removed declarations: `pt_regs`, `in6_addr`.
The running time of `btf__dedup` function is increased by about 3%.

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221109142611.879983-3-eddyz87@gmail.com
2022-11-12 18:24:12 -08:00
Eduard Zingerman 4a65c5d888 libbpf: Hashmap interface update to allow both long and void* keys/values
An update for libbpf's hashmap interface from void* -> void* to a
polymorphic one, allowing both long and void* keys and values.

This simplifies many use cases in libbpf as hashmaps there are mostly
integer to integer.

Perf copies hashmap implementation from libbpf and has to be
updated as well.

Changes to libbpf, selftests/bpf and perf are packed as a single
commit to avoid compilation issues with any future bisect.

Polymorphic interface is acheived by hiding hashmap interface
functions behind auxiliary macros that take care of necessary
type casts, for example:

    #define hashmap_cast_ptr(p)						\
	({								\
		_Static_assert((p) == NULL || sizeof(*(p)) == sizeof(long),\
			       #p " pointee should be a long-sized integer or a pointer"); \
		(long *)(p);						\
	})

    bool hashmap_find(const struct hashmap *map, long key, long *value);

    #define hashmap__find(map, key, value) \
		hashmap_find((map), (long)(key), hashmap_cast_ptr(value))

- hashmap__find macro casts key and value parameters to long
  and long* respectively
- hashmap_cast_ptr ensures that value pointer points to a memory
  of appropriate size.

This hack was suggested by Andrii Nakryiko in [1].
This is a follow up for [2].

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzZ8KFneEJxFAaNCCFPGqp20hSpS2aCj76uRk3-qZUH5xg@mail.gmail.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/af1facf9-7bc8-8a3d-0db4-7b3f333589a2@meta.com/T/#m65b28f1d6d969fcd318b556db6a3ad499a42607d

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221109142611.879983-2-eddyz87@gmail.com
2022-11-12 18:24:12 -08:00
Eduard Zingerman 3a387f5a8f libbpf: Resolve enum fwd as full enum64 and vice versa
Changes de-duplication logic for enums in the following way:
- update btf_hash_enum to ignore size and kind fields to get
  ENUM and ENUM64 types in a same hash bucket;
- update btf_compat_enum to consider enum fwd to be compatible with
  full enum64 (and vice versa);

This allows BTF de-duplication in the following case:

    // CU #1
    enum foo;

    struct s {
      enum foo *a;
    } *x;

    // CU #2
    enum foo {
      x = 0xfffffffff // big enough to force enum64
    };

    struct s {
      enum foo *a;
    } *y;

De-duplicated BTF prior to this commit:

    [1] ENUM64 'foo' encoding=UNSIGNED size=8 vlen=1
    	'x' val=68719476735ULL
    [2] INT 'long unsigned int' size=8 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=64
        encoding=(none)
    [3] STRUCT 's' size=8 vlen=1
    	'a' type_id=4 bits_offset=0
    [4] PTR '(anon)' type_id=1
    [5] PTR '(anon)' type_id=3
    [6] STRUCT 's' size=8 vlen=1
    	'a' type_id=8 bits_offset=0
    [7] ENUM 'foo' encoding=UNSIGNED size=4 vlen=0
    [8] PTR '(anon)' type_id=7
    [9] PTR '(anon)' type_id=6

De-duplicated BTF after this commit:

    [1] ENUM64 'foo' encoding=UNSIGNED size=8 vlen=1
    	'x' val=68719476735ULL
    [2] INT 'long unsigned int' size=8 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=64
        encoding=(none)
    [3] STRUCT 's' size=8 vlen=1
    	'a' type_id=4 bits_offset=0
    [4] PTR '(anon)' type_id=1
    [5] PTR '(anon)' type_id=3

Enum forward declarations in C do not provide information about
enumeration values range. Thus the `btf_type->size` field is
meaningless for forward enum declarations. In fact, GCC does not
encode size in DWARF for forward enum declarations
(but dwarves sets enumeration size to a default value of `sizeof(int) * 8`
when size is not specified see dwarf_loader.c:die__create_new_enumeration).

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221101235413.1824260-1-eddyz87@gmail.com
2022-11-12 18:24:12 -08:00
Eduard Zingerman 3d3ff49213 bpftool: Print newline before '}' for struct with padding only fields
btf_dump_emit_struct_def attempts to print empty structures at a
single line, e.g. `struct empty {}`. However, it has to account for a
case when there are no regular but some padding fields in the struct.
In such case `vlen` would be zero, but size would be non-zero.

E.g. here is struct bpf_timer from vmlinux.h before this patch:

 struct bpf_timer {
 	long: 64;
	long: 64;};

And after this patch:

 struct bpf_dynptr {
 	long: 64;
	long: 64;
 };

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221001104425.415768-1-eddyz87@gmail.com
2022-10-17 13:13:02 -07:00