There is an out-of-bounds read in bpf_link_show_fdinfo() for the sockmap
link fd. Fix it by adding the missing BPF_LINK_TYPE invocation for
sockmap link
Also add comments for bpf_link_type to prevent missing updates in the
future.
Fixes: 699c23f02c65 ("bpf: Add bpf_link support for sk_msg and sk_skb progs")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241024013558.1135167-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Since BPF skeleton inception libbpf has been doing mmap()'ing of global
data ARRAY maps in bpf_object__load_skeleton() API, which is used by
code generated .skel.h files (i.e., by BPF skeletons only).
This is wrong because if BPF object is loaded through generic
bpf_object__load() API, global data maps won't be re-mmap()'ed after
load step, and memory pointers returned from bpf_map__initial_value()
would be wrong and won't reflect the actual memory shared between BPF
program and user space.
bpf_map__initial_value() return result is rarely used after load, so
this went unnoticed for a really long time, until bpftrace project
attempted to load BPF object through generic bpf_object__load() API and
then used BPF subskeleton instantiated from such bpf_object. It turned
out that .data/.rodata/.bss data updates through such subskeleton was
"blackholed", all because libbpf wouldn't re-mmap() those maps during
bpf_object__load() phase.
Long story short, this step should be done by libbpf regardless of BPF
skeleton usage, right after BPF map is created in the kernel. This patch
moves this functionality into bpf_object__populate_internal_map() to
achieve this. And bpf_object__load_skeleton() is now simple and almost
trivial, only propagating these mmap()'ed pointers into user-supplied
skeleton structs.
We also do trivial adjustments to error reporting inside
bpf_object__populate_internal_map() for consistency with the rest of
libbpf's map-handling code.
Reported-by: Alastair Robertson <ajor@meta.com>
Reported-by: Jonathan Wiepert <jwiepert@meta.com>
Fixes: d66562fba1ce ("libbpf: Add BPF object skeleton support")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241023043908.3834423-3-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Initialize 'new_off' and 'pad_bits' to 0 and 'pad_type' to NULL in
btf_dump_emit_bit_padding to prevent compiler warnings/errors which are
observed when compiling with 'EXTRA_CFLAGS=-g -Og' options, but do not
happen when compiling with current default options.
For example, when compiling libbpf with
$ make "EXTRA_CFLAGS=-g -Og" -C tools/lib/bpf/ clean all
Clang version 17.0.6 and GCC 13.3.1 fail to compile btf_dump.c due to
following errors:
btf_dump.c: In function ‘btf_dump_emit_bit_padding’:
btf_dump.c:903:42: error: ‘new_off’ may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
903 | if (new_off > cur_off && new_off <= next_off) {
| ~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~
btf_dump.c:870:13: note: ‘new_off’ was declared here
870 | int new_off, pad_bits, bits, i;
| ^~~~~~~
btf_dump.c:917:25: error: ‘pad_type’ may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
917 | btf_dump_printf(d, "\n%s%s: %d;", pfx(lvl), pad_type,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
918 | in_bitfield ? new_off - cur_off : 0);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
btf_dump.c:871:21: note: ‘pad_type’ was declared here
871 | const char *pad_type;
| ^~~~~~~~
btf_dump.c:930:20: error: ‘pad_bits’ may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
930 | if (bits == pad_bits) {
| ^
btf_dump.c:870:22: note: ‘pad_bits’ was declared here
870 | int new_off, pad_bits, bits, i;
| ^~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Signed-off-by: Eder Zulian <ezulian@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241022172329.3871958-3-ezulian@redhat.com
The hashmap__for_each_entry[_safe] is accessing 'map' as a pointer.
But it does without parentheses so passing a static hash map with an
ampersand (like '&slab_hash') will cause compiler warnings due
to unmatched types as '->' operator has a higher precedence.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241011170021.1490836-1-namhyung@kernel.org
Libbpf pre-1.0 had a legacy logic of allowing singular non-annotated
(i.e., not having explicit SEC() annotation) function to be treated as
sole entry BPF program (unless there were other explicit entry
programs).
This behavior was dropped during libbpf 1.0 transition period (unless
LIBBPF_STRICT_SEC_NAME flag was unset in libbpf_mode). When 1.0 was
released and all the legacy behavior was removed, the bug slipped
through leaving this legacy behavior around.
Fix this for good, as it actually causes very confusing behavior if BPF
object file only has subprograms, but no entry programs.
Fixes: bd054102a8c7 ("libbpf: enforce strict libbpf 1.0 behaviors")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241010211731.4121837-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The documentation says CONFIG_FUNCTION_ERROR_INJECTION is supported only
on x86. This was presumably true at the time of writing, but it's now
supported on many other architectures too. Drop this statement, since
it's not correct anymore and it fits better in other documentation
anyway.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kelly <martin.kelly@crowdstrike.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241010193301.995909-1-martin.kelly@crowdstrike.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
sym_is_subprog() is incorrectly rejecting relocations against *weak*
global subprogs. Fix that by realizing that STB_WEAK is also a global
function.
While it seems like verifier doesn't support taking an address of
non-static subprog right now, it's still best to fix support for it on
libbpf side, otherwise users will get a very confusing error during BPF
skeleton generation or static linking due to misinterpreted relocation:
libbpf: prog 'handle_tp': bad map relo against 'foo' in section '.text'
Error: failed to open BPF object file: Relocation failed
It's clearly not a map relocation, but is treated and reported as such
without this fix.
Fixes: 53eddb5e04ac ("libbpf: Support subprog address relocation")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241009011554.880168-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Since [1] kernel supports __bpf_fastcall attribute for helper function
bpf_get_smp_processor_id(). Update uapi definition for this helper in
order to have this attribute in the generated bpf_helper_defs.h
[1] commit 91b7fbf3936f ("bpf, x86, riscv, arm: no_caller_saved_registers for bpf_get_smp_processor_id()")
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240916091712.2929279-3-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Track target endianness in 'struct bpf_gen' and process in-memory data in
native byte-order, but on finalization convert the embedded loader BPF
insns to target endianness.
The light skeleton also includes a target-accessed data blob which is
heterogeneous and thus difficult to convert to target byte-order on
finalization. Add support functions to convert data to target endianness
as it is added to the blob.
Also add additional debug logging for data blob structure details and
skeleton loading.
Signed-off-by: Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/569562e1d5bf1cce80a1f1a3882461ee2da1ffd5.1726475448.git.tony.ambardar@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Allow static linking object files of either endianness, checking that input
files have consistent byte-order, and setting output endianness from input.
Linking requires in-memory processing of programs, relocations, sections,
etc. in native endianness, and output conversion to target byte-order. This
is enabled by built-in ELF translation and recent BTF/BTF.ext endianness
functions. Further add local functions for swapping byte-order of sections
containing BPF insns.
Signed-off-by: Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/b47ca686d02664843fc99b96262fe3259650bc43.1726475448.git.tony.ambardar@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Support for handling BTF data of either endianness was added in [1], but
did not include BTF.ext data for lack of use cases. Later, support for
static linking [2] provided a use case, but this feature and later ones
were restricted to native-endian usage.
Add support for BTF.ext handling in either endianness. Convert BTF.ext data
to native endianness when read into memory for further processing, and
support raw data access that restores the original byte-order for output.
Add internal header functions for byte-swapping func, line, and core info
records.
Add new API functions btf_ext__endianness() and btf_ext__set_endianness()
for query and setting byte-order, as already exist for BTF data.
[1] 3289959b97ca ("libbpf: Support BTF loading and raw data output in both endianness")
[2] 8fd27bf69b86 ("libbpf: Add BPF static linker BTF and BTF.ext support")
Signed-off-by: Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/133407ab20e0dd5c07cab2a6fa7879dee1ffa4bc.1726475448.git.tony.ambardar@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Referenced commit broke the logic of resetting expected_attach_type to
zero for allowed program types if kernel doesn't yet support such field.
We do need to overwrite and preserve expected_attach_type for
multi-uprobe though, but that can be done explicitly in
libbpf_prepare_prog_load().
Fixes: 5902da6d8a52 ("libbpf: Add uprobe multi link support to bpf_program__attach_usdt")
Suggested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240925153012.212866-1-chen.dylane@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reduce log level of BTF loading error to INFO if BTF is not required.
Andrii says:
Nowadays the expectation is that the BPF program will have a valid
.BTF section, so even though .BTF is "optional", I think it's fine
to emit a warning for that case (any reasonably recent Clang will
produce valid BTF).
Ihor's patch is fixing the situation with an outdated host kernel
that doesn't understand BTF. libbpf will try to "upload" the
program's BTF, but if that fails and the BPF object doesn't use
any features that require having BTF uploaded, then it's just an
information message to the user, but otherwise can be ignored.
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@pm.me>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
As reported by Andrii we don't currently recognize uretprobe.multi.s
programs as return probes due to using (wrong) strcmp function.
Using str_has_pfx() instead to match uretprobe.multi prefix.
Tests are passing, because the return program was executed
as entry program and all counts were incremented properly.
Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240910125336.3056271-1-jolsa@kernel.org
We get this with GCC 15 -O3 (at least):
```
libbpf.c: In function ‘bpf_map__init_kern_struct_ops’:
libbpf.c:1109:18: error: ‘mod_btf’ may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
1109 | kern_btf = mod_btf ? mod_btf->btf : obj->btf_vmlinux;
| ~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
libbpf.c:1094:28: note: ‘mod_btf’ was declared here
1094 | struct module_btf *mod_btf;
| ^~~~~~~
In function ‘find_struct_ops_kern_types’,
inlined from ‘bpf_map__init_kern_struct_ops’ at libbpf.c:1102:8:
libbpf.c:982:21: error: ‘btf’ may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
982 | kern_type = btf__type_by_id(btf, kern_type_id);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
libbpf.c: In function ‘bpf_map__init_kern_struct_ops’:
libbpf.c:967:21: note: ‘btf’ was declared here
967 | struct btf *btf;
| ^~~
```
This is similar to the other libbpf fix from a few weeks ago for
the same modelling-errno issue (fab45b962749184e1a1a57c7c583782b78fad539).
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://bugs.gentoo.org/939106
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/f6962729197ae7cdf4f6d1512625bd92f2322d31.1725630494.git.sam@gentoo.org
Hi, fix some spelling errors in libbpf, the details are as follows:
-in the code comments:
termintaing->terminating
architecutre->architecture
requring->requiring
recored->recoded
sanitise->sanities
allowd->allowed
abover->above
see bpf_udst_arg()->see bpf_usdt_arg()
Signed-off-by: Lin Yikai <yikai.lin@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240905110354.3274546-3-yikai.lin@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Currently the only opportunity to set sock ops flags dictating
which callbacks fire for a socket is from within a TCP-BPF sockops
program. This is problematic if the connection is already set up
as there is no further chance to specify callbacks for that socket.
Add TCP_BPF_SOCK_OPS_CB_FLAGS to bpf_setsockopt() and bpf_getsockopt()
to allow users to specify callbacks later, either via an iterator
over sockets or via a socket-specific program triggered by a
setsockopt() on the socket.
Previous discussion on this here [1].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/f42f157b-6e52-dd4d-3d97-9b86c84c0b00@oracle.com/
Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240808150558.1035626-2-alan.maguire@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Kernel/libbpf code is very well tested on s390x in BPF CI, so get rid of
it here as it often is a source of trouble and noise, without really
benefiting us much.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
