Add simple sanity checks that validate well-formed ranges (min <= max)
across u64, s64, u32, and s32 ranges. Also for cases when the value is
constant (either 64-bit or 32-bit), we validate that ranges and tnums
are in agreement.
These bounds checks are performed at the end of BPF_ALU/BPF_ALU64
operations, on conditional jumps, and for LDX instructions (where subreg
zero/sign extension is probably the most important to check). This
covers most of the interesting cases.
Also, we validate the sanity of the return register when manually
adjusting it for some special helpers.
By default, sanity violation will trigger a warning in verifier log and
resetting register bounds to "unbounded" ones. But to aid development
and debugging, BPF_F_TEST_SANITY_STRICT flag is added, which will
trigger hard failure of verification with -EFAULT on register bounds
violations. This allows selftests to catch such issues. veristat will
also gain a CLI option to enable this behavior.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231112010609.848406-5-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Apply fe69a1b1b6ed ("selftests: bpf: xskxceiver: ksft_print_msg: fix
format type error") to make bpf-next build.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Fix too eager assumption that SHT_GNU_verdef ELF section is going to be
present whenever binary has SHT_GNU_versym section. It seems like either
SHT_GNU_verdef or SHT_GNU_verneed can be used, so failing on missing
SHT_GNU_verdef actually breaks use cases in production.
One specific reported issue, which was used to manually test this fix,
was trying to attach to `readline` function in BASH binary.
Fixes: bb7fa09399b9 ("libbpf: Support symbol versioning for uprobe")
Reported-by: Liam Wisehart <liamwisehart@meta.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Manu Bretelle <chantr4@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>
Acked-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231016182840.4033346-1-andrii@kernel.org
It doesn't work on 5.5 and was just recently introduced as a new subtest
to already existing test. Add subtest to denylist.
Also clean up old denylist, leaving only "exception" relative to
ALLOWLIST.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
GCC started complaining that some of libbpf pr_warn() statements might
be passing NULL for map name. Map name is never NULL for non-NULL map
pointer, so this is a false positive which triggers build failures.
Silence format-overflow warning altogether to avoid this in the future
as well.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Syncing latest libbpf commits from kernel repository.
Baseline bpf-next commit: a3e7e6b17946f48badce98d7ac360678a0ea7393
Checkpoint bpf-next commit: 0a55264cf966fb95ebf9d03d9f81fa992f069312
Baseline bpf commit: 496720b7cfb6574a8f6f4d434f23e3d1e6cfaeb9
Checkpoint bpf commit: 23d775f12dcd23d052a4927195f15e970e27ab26
Alan Maguire (1):
bpf: sync tools/ uapi header with
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (1):
tools headers uapi: Sync linux/fcntl.h with the kernel sources
Daniel Borkmann (5):
bpf: Add generic attach/detach/query API for multi-progs
bpf: Add fd-based tcx multi-prog infra with link support
libbpf: Add opts-based attach/detach/query API for tcx
libbpf: Add link-based API for tcx
libbpf: Add helper macro to clear opts structs
Daniel Xu (1):
netfilter: bpf: Support BPF_F_NETFILTER_IP_DEFRAG in netfilter link
Dave Marchevsky (1):
libbpf: Support triple-underscore flavors for kfunc relocation
Jiri Olsa (1):
bpf: Add support for bpf_get_func_ip helper for uprobe program
Lorenz Bauer (1):
bpf, net: Support SO_REUSEPORT sockets with bpf_sk_assign
Maciej Fijalkowski (1):
xsk: add new netlink attribute dedicated for ZC max frags
Magnus Karlsson (2):
selftests/xsk: transmit and receive multi-buffer packets
selftests/xsk: add basic multi-buffer test
Marco Vedovati (1):
libbpf: Set close-on-exec flag on gzopen
Sergey Kacheev (1):
libbpf: Use local includes inside the library
Stanislav Fomichev (1):
ynl: regenerate all headers
Yafang Shao (2):
bpf: Support ->fill_link_info for kprobe_multi
bpf: Support ->fill_link_info for perf_event
Yonghong Song (1):
bpf: Support new sign-extension load insns
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h | 5 ++
include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h | 9 +++
include/uapi/linux/netdev.h | 4 +-
src/bpf.c | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
src/bpf.h | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
src/bpf_tracing.h | 2 +-
src/libbpf.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
src/libbpf.h | 18 ++++-
src/libbpf.map | 2 +
src/libbpf_common.h | 16 +++++
src/netlink.c | 5 ++
src/usdt.bpf.h | 4 +-
13 files changed, 423 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
realloc() and reallocarray() can either return NULL or a special
non-NULL pointer, if their size argument is zero. This requires a bit
more care to handle NULL-as-valid-result situation differently from
NULL-as-error case. This has caused real issues before ([0]), and just
recently bit again in production when performing bpf_program__attach_usdt().
This patch fixes 4 places that do or potentially could suffer from this
mishandling of NULL, including the reported USDT-related one.
There are many other places where realloc()/reallocarray() is used and
NULL is always treated as an error value, but all those have guarantees
that their size is always non-zero, so those spot don't need any extra
handling.
[0] d08ab82f59d5 ("libbpf: Fix double-free when linker processes empty sections")
Fixes: 999783c8bbda ("libbpf: Wire up spec management and other arch-independent USDT logic")
Fixes: b63b3c490eee ("libbpf: Add bpf_program__set_insns function")
Fixes: 697f104db8a6 ("libbpf: Support custom SEC() handlers")
Fixes: b12688267280 ("libbpf: Change the order of data and text relocations.")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230711024150.1566433-1-andrii@kernel.org
Don't reset recorded sec_def handler unconditionally on
bpf_program__set_type(). There are two situations where this is wrong.
First, if the program type didn't actually change. In that case original
SEC handler should work just fine.
Second, catch-all custom SEC handler is supposed to work with any BPF
program type and SEC() annotation, so it also doesn't make sense to
reset that.
This patch fixes both issues. This was reported recently in the context
of breaking perf tool, which uses custom catch-all handler for fancy BPF
prologue generation logic. This patch should fix the issue.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/ab865e6d-06c5-078e-e404-7f90686db50d@amd.com/
Fixes: d6e6286a12e7 ("libbpf: disassociate section handler on explicit bpf_program__set_type() call")
Reported-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230707231156.1711948-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Make sure that libbpf code always gets FD with O_CLOEXEC flag set,
regardless if file is open through open() or fopen(). For the latter
this means to add "e" to mode string, which is supported since pretty
ancient glibc v2.7.
Also drop the outdated TODO comment in usdt.c, which was already completed.
Suggested-by: Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230525221311.2136408-1-andrii@kernel.org
Current UAPI of BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET commands of bpf() syscall
forces users to specify pinning location as a string-based absolute or
relative (to current working directory) path. This has various
implications related to security (e.g., symlink-based attacks), forces
BPF FS to be exposed in the file system, which can cause races with
other applications.
One of the feedbacks we got from folks working with containers heavily
was that inability to use purely FD-based location specification was an
unfortunate limitation and hindrance for BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET
commands. This patch closes this oversight, adding path_fd field to
BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET UAPI, following conventions established by
*at() syscalls for dirfd + pathname combinations.
This now allows interesting possibilities like working with detached BPF
FS mount (e.g., to perform multiple pinnings without running a risk of
someone interfering with them), and generally making pinning/getting
more secure and not prone to any races and/or security attacks.
This is demonstrated by a selftest added in subsequent patch that takes
advantage of new mount APIs (fsopen, fsconfig, fsmount) to demonstrate
creating detached BPF FS mount, pinning, and then getting BPF map out of
it, all while never exposing this private instance of BPF FS to outside
worlds.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230523170013.728457-4-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
It seems like __builtin_offset() doesn't preserve CO-RE field
relocations properly. So if offsetof() macro is defined through
__builtin_offset(), CO-RE-enabled BPF code using container_of() will be
subtly and silently broken.
To avoid this problem, redefine offsetof() and container_of() in the
form that works with CO-RE relocations more reliably.
Fixes: 5fbc220862fc ("tools/libpf: Add offsetof/container_of macro in bpf_helpers.h")
Reported-by: Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230509065502.2306180-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Mark bpf_iter_num_{new,next,destroy}() kfuncs declared for
bpf_for()/bpf_repeat() macros as __weak to allow users to feature-detect
their presence and guard bpf_for()/bpf_repeat() loops accordingly for
backwards compatibility with old kernels.
Now that libbpf supports kfunc calls poisoning and better reporting of
unresolved (but called) kfuncs, declaring number iterator kfuncs in
bpf_helpers.h won't degrade user experience and won't cause unnecessary
kernel feature dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230418002148.3255690-7-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
To make it easier for bleeding-edge BPF applications, such as sched_ext,
to utilize open-coded iterators, move bpf_for(), bpf_for_each(), and
bpf_repeat() macros from selftests/bpf-internal bpf_misc.h helper, to
libbpf-provided bpf_helpers.h header.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230418002148.3255690-6-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Currently, libbpf leaves `call #0` instruction for __weak unresolved
kfuncs, which might lead to a confusing verifier log situations, where
invalid `call #0` will be treated as successfully validated.
We can do better. Libbpf already has an established mechanism of
poisoning instructions that failed some form of resolution (e.g., CO-RE
relocation and BPF map set to not be auto-created). Libbpf doesn't fail
them outright to allow users to guard them through other means, and as
long as BPF verifier can prove that such poisoned instructions cannot be
ever reached, this doesn't consistute an invalid BPF program. If user
didn't guard such code, libbpf will extract few pieces of information to
tie such poisoned instructions back to additional information about what
entitity wasn't resolved (e.g., BPF map name, or CO-RE relocation
information).
__weak unresolved kfuncs fit this model well, so this patch extends
libbpf with poisioning and log fixup logic for kfunc calls.
Note, this poisoning is done only for kfunc *calls*, not kfunc address
resolution (ldimm64 instructions). The former cannot be ever valid, if
reached, so it's safe to poison them. The latter is a valid mechanism to
check if __weak kfunc ksym was resolved, and do necessary guarding and
work arounds based on this result, supported in most recent kernels. As
such, libbpf keeps such ldimm64 instructions as loading zero, never
poisoning them.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230418002148.3255690-4-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Currently libbpf always reports "kernel" as a source of ksym BTF type,
which is ambiguous given ksym's BTF can come from either vmlinux or
kernel module BTFs. Make this explicit and log module name, if used BTF
is from kernel module.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230418002148.3255690-3-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Normalize internal constants, field names, and comments related to log
fixup. Also add explicit `ext_idx` alias for relocation where relocation
is pointing to extern description for additional information.
No functional changes, just a clean up before subsequent additions.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230418002148.3255690-2-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add output-only log_true_size field to bpf_prog_load_opts to return
bpf_attr->log_true_size value back from bpf() syscall.
Note, that we have to drop const modifier from opts in bpf_prog_load().
This could potentially cause compilation error for some users. But
the usual practice is to define bpf_prog_load_ops
as a local variable next to bpf_prog_load() call and pass pointer to it,
so const vs non-const makes no difference and won't even come up in most
(if not all) cases.
There are no runtime and ABI backwards/forward compatibility issues at all.
If user provides old struct bpf_prog_load_opts, libbpf won't set new
fields. If old libbpf is provided new bpf_prog_load_opts, nothing will
happen either as old libbpf doesn't yet know about this new field.
Adding a new variant of bpf_prog_load() just for this seems like a big
and unnecessary overkill. As a corroborating evidence is the fact that
entire selftests/bpf code base required not adjustment whatsoever.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230406234205.323208-16-andrii@kernel.org
Add output-only log_true_size and btf_log_true_size field to
BPF_PROG_LOAD and BPF_BTF_LOAD commands, respectively. It will return
the size of log buffer necessary to fit in all the log contents at
specified log_level. This is very useful for BPF loader libraries like
libbpf to be able to size log buffer correctly, but could be used by
users directly, if necessary, as well.
This patch plumbs all this through the code, taking into account actual
bpf_attr size provided by user to determine if these new fields are
expected by users. And if they are, set them from kernel on return.
We refactory btf_parse() function to accommodate this, moving attr and
uattr handling inside it. The rest is very straightforward code, which
is split from the logging accounting changes in the previous patch to
make it simpler to review logic vs UAPI changes.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@isovalent.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230406234205.323208-13-andrii@kernel.org
We don't need to archive assets/ subdir when packaging libbpf sources in
retsnoop and veristat repos. Mark assets/ as export-ignore to skip it.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
If user explicitly overrides programs's type with
bpf_program__set_type() API call, we need to disassociate whatever
SEC_DEF handler libbpf determined initially based on program's SEC()
definition, as it's not goind to be valid anymore and could lead to
crashes and/or confusing failures.
Also, fix up bpf_prog_test_load() helper in selftests/bpf, which is
force-setting program type (even if that's completely unnecessary; this
is quite a legacy piece of code), and thus should expect auto-attach to
not work, yet one of the tests explicitly relies on auto-attach for
testing.
Instead, force-set program type only if it differs from the desired one.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230327185202.1929145-2-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Seems like deafult branch was renamed s/master/main/, adopt libbpf CI to
not fail.
Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Seems like upstream LLVM/Clang packaging still has issues with
llvm/clang 17. Fallback to 16 again, for now.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Implement the first open-coded iterator type over a range of integers.
It's public API consists of:
- bpf_iter_num_new() constructor, which accepts [start, end) range
(that is, start is inclusive, end is exclusive).
- bpf_iter_num_next() which will keep returning read-only pointer to int
until the range is exhausted, at which point NULL will be returned.
If bpf_iter_num_next() is kept calling after this, NULL will be
persistently returned.
- bpf_iter_num_destroy() destructor, which needs to be called at some
point to clean up iterator state. BPF verifier enforces that iterator
destructor is called at some point before BPF program exits.
Note that `start = end = X` is a valid combination to setup an empty
iterator. bpf_iter_num_new() will return 0 (success) for any such
combination.
If bpf_iter_num_new() detects invalid combination of input arguments, it
returns error, resets iterator state to, effectively, empty iterator, so
any subsequent call to bpf_iter_num_next() will keep returning NULL.
BPF verifier has no knowledge that returned integers are in the
[start, end) value range, as both `start` and `end` are not statically
known and enforced: they are runtime values.
While the implementation is pretty trivial, some care needs to be taken
to avoid overflows and underflows. Subsequent selftests will validate
correctness of [start, end) semantics, especially around extremes
(INT_MIN and INT_MAX).
Similarly to bpf_loop(), we enforce that no more than BPF_MAX_LOOPS can
be specified.
bpf_iter_num_{new,next,destroy}() is a logical evolution from bounded
BPF loops and bpf_loop() helper and is the basis for implementing
ergonomic BPF loops with no statically known or verified bounds.
Subsequent patches implement bpf_for() macro, demonstrating how this can
be wrapped into something that works and feels like a normal for() loop
in C language.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308184121.1165081-5-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Each architecture supports at least 6 syscall argument registers, so now
that specs for each architecture is defined in bpf_tracing.h, remove
unnecessary macro overrides, which previously were required to keep
existing BPF_KSYSCALL() uses compiling and working.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230120200914.3008030-26-andrii@kernel.org
Set up generic support in bpf_tracing.h for up to 7 syscall arguments
tracing with BPF_KSYSCALL, which seems to be the limit according to
syscall(2) manpage. Also change the way that syscall convention is
specified to be more explicit. Subsequent patches will adjust and define
proper per-architecture syscall conventions.
__PT_PARM1_SYSCALL_REG through __PT_PARM6_SYSCALL_REG is added
temporarily to keep everything working before each architecture has
syscall reg tables defined. They will be removed afterwards.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> # arm64
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230120200914.3008030-13-andrii@kernel.org
Add BPF_UPROBE and BPF_URETPROBE macros, aliased to BPF_KPROBE and
BPF_KRETPROBE, respectively. This makes uprobe-based BPF program code
much less confusing, especially to people new to tracing, at no cost in
terms of maintainability. We'll use this macro in selftests in
subsequent patch.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230120200914.3008030-11-andrii@kernel.org
Add BPF_KPROBE() and PT_REGS_PARMx() support for up to 8 arguments, if
target architecture supports this. Currently all architectures are
limited to only 5 register-placed arguments, which is limiting even on
x86-64.
This patch adds generic macro machinery to support up to 8 arguments
both when explicitly fetching it from pt_regs through PT_REGS_PARMx()
macros, as well as more ergonomic access in BPF_KPROBE().
Also, for i386 architecture we now don't have to define fake PARM4 and
PARM5 definitions, they will be generically substituted, just like for
PARM6 through PARM8.
Subsequent patches will fill out architecture-specific definitions,
where appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> # arm64
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> # s390x
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230120200914.3008030-2-andrii@kernel.org
Fix bug in btf_dump's logic of determining if a given struct type is
packed or not. The notion of "natural alignment" is not needed and is
even harmful in this case, so drop it altogether. The biggest difference
in btf_is_struct_packed() compared to its original implementation is
that we don't really use btf__align_of() to determine overall alignment
of a struct type (because it could be 1 for both packed and non-packed
struct, depending on specifci field definitions), and just use field's
actual alignment to calculate whether any field is requiring packing or
struct's size overall necessitates packing.
Add two simple test cases that demonstrate the difference this change
would make.
Fixes: ea2ce1ba99aa ("libbpf: Fix BTF-to-C converter's padding logic")
Reported-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221215183605.4149488-1-andrii@kernel.org
Turns out that btf_dump API doesn't handle a bunch of tricky corner
cases, as reported by Per, and further discovered using his testing
Python script ([0]).
This patch revamps btf_dump's padding logic significantly, making it
more correct and also avoiding unnecessary explicit padding, where
compiler would pad naturally. This overall topic turned out to be very
tricky and subtle, there are lots of subtle corner cases. The comments
in the code tries to give some clues, but comments themselves are
supposed to be paired with good understanding of C alignment and padding
rules. Plus some experimentation to figure out subtle things like
whether `long :0;` means that struct is now forced to be long-aligned
(no, it's not, turns out).
Anyways, Per's script, while not completely correct in some known
situations, doesn't show any obvious cases where this logic breaks, so
this is a nice improvement over the previous state of this logic.
Some selftests had to be adjusted to accommodate better use of natural
alignment rules, eliminating some unnecessary padding, or changing it to
`type: 0;` alignment markers.
Note also that for when we are in between bitfields, we emit explicit
bit size, while otherwise we use `: 0`, this feels much more natural in
practice.
Next patch will add few more test cases, found through randomized Per's
script.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/85f83c333f5355c8ac026f835b18d15060725fcb.camel@ericsson.com/
Reported-by: Per Sundström XP <per.xp.sundstrom@ericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221212211505.558851-6-andrii@kernel.org
btf__align_of() is supposed to be return alignment requirement of
a requested BTF type. For STRUCT/UNION it doesn't always return correct
value, because it calculates alignment only based on field types. But
for packed structs this is not enough, we need to also check field
offsets and struct size. If field offset isn't aligned according to
field type's natural alignment, then struct must be packed. Similarly,
if struct size is not a multiple of struct's natural alignment, then
struct must be packed as well.
This patch fixes this issue precisely by additionally checking these
conditions.
Fixes: 3d208f4ca111 ("libbpf: Expose btf__align_of() API")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221212211505.558851-5-andrii@kernel.org
Turns out C allows to force enum to be 1-byte or 8-byte explicitly using
mode(byte) or mode(word), respecticely. Linux sources are using this in
some cases. This is imporant to handle correctly, as enum size
determines corresponding fields in a struct that use that enum type. And
if enum size is incorrect, this will lead to invalid struct layout. So
add mode(byte) and mode(word) attribute support to btf_dump APIs.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221212211505.558851-3-andrii@kernel.org
btf_dump APIs emit unnecessary tabs when emitting struct/union
definition that fits on the single line. Before this patch we'd get:
struct blah {<tab>};
This patch fixes this and makes sure that we get more natural:
struct blah {};
Fixes: 44a726c3f23c ("bpftool: Print newline before '}' for struct with padding only fields")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221212211505.558851-2-andrii@kernel.org
Having too new build environment in workflows that build selftests on
the host, but run them in a separate QEMU image can lead to problems
with runtime linker complaining about missing new enough version of
glibc and other dependencies.
Until we update images, fix used Ubuntu version to ubuntu-20.04 to
mitigate.
Suggested-by: Manu Bretelle <chantr4@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
C++ enum forward declarations are fundamentally not compatible with pure
C enum definitions, and so libbpf's use of `enum bpf_stats_type;`
forward declaration in libbpf/bpf.h public API header is causing C++
compilation issues.
More details can be found in [0], but it comes down to C++ supporting
enum forward declaration only with explicitly specified backing type:
enum bpf_stats_type: int;
In C (and I believe it's a GCC extension also), such forward declaration
is simply:
enum bpf_stats_type;
Further, in Linux UAPI this enum is defined in pure C way:
enum bpf_stats_type { BPF_STATS_RUN_TIME = 0; }
And even though in both cases backing type is int, which can be
confirmed by looking at DWARF information, for C++ compiler actual enum
definition and forward declaration are incompatible.
To eliminate this problem, for C++ mode define input argument as int,
which makes enum unnecessary in libbpf public header. This solves the
issue and as demonstrated by next patch doesn't cause any unwanted
compiler warnings, at least with default warnings setting.
[0] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42766839/c11-enum-forward-causes-underlying-type-mismatch
[1] Closes: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/issues/249
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221130200013.2997831-1-andrii@kernel.org
Andrii Nakryiko