In some cases compiler seems to generate distinct DWARF types for identical
arrays within the same CU. That seems like a bug, but it's already out there
and breaks type graph equivalence checks, so accommodate it anyway by checking
for identical arrays, regardless of their type ID.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201105043402.2530976-10-andrii@kernel.org
Add support for deduplication split BTFs. When deduplicating split BTF, base
BTF is considered to be immutable and can't be modified or adjusted. 99% of
BTF deduplication logic is left intact (module some type numbering adjustments).
There are only two differences.
First, each type in base BTF gets hashed (expect VAR and DATASEC, of course,
those are always considered to be self-canonical instances) and added into
a table of canonical table candidates. Hashing is a shallow, fast operation,
so mostly eliminates the overhead of having entire base BTF to be a part of
BTF dedup.
Second difference is very critical and subtle. While deduplicating split BTF
types, it is possible to discover that one of immutable base BTF BTF_KIND_FWD
types can and should be resolved to a full STRUCT/UNION type from the split
BTF part. This is, obviously, can't happen because we can't modify the base
BTF types anymore. So because of that, any type in split BTF that directly or
indirectly references that newly-to-be-resolved FWD type can't be considered
to be equivalent to the corresponding canonical types in base BTF, because
that would result in a loss of type resolution information. So in such case,
split BTF types will be deduplicated separately and will cause some
duplication of type information, which is unavoidable.
With those two changes, the rest of the algorithm manages to deduplicate split
BTF correctly, pointing all the duplicates to their canonical counter-parts in
base BTF, but also is deduplicating whatever unique types are present in split
BTF on their own.
Also, theoretically, split BTF after deduplication could end up with either
empty type section or empty string section. This is handled by libbpf
correctly in one of previous patches in the series.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201105043402.2530976-9-andrii@kernel.org
Make data section layout checks stricter, disallowing overlap of types and
strings data.
Additionally, allow BTFs with no type data. There is nothing inherently wrong
with having BTF with no types (put potentially with some strings). This could
be a situation with kernel module BTFs, if module doesn't introduce any new
type information.
Also fix invalid offset alignment check for btf->hdr->type_off.
Fixes: 8a138aed4a80 ("bpf: btf: Add BTF support to libbpf")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201105043402.2530976-8-andrii@kernel.org
Support split BTF operation, in which one BTF (base BTF) provides basic set of
types and strings, while another one (split BTF) builds on top of base's types
and strings and adds its own new types and strings. From API standpoint, the
fact that the split BTF is built on top of the base BTF is transparent.
Type numeration is transparent. If the base BTF had last type ID #N, then all
types in the split BTF start at type ID N+1. Any type in split BTF can
reference base BTF types, but not vice versa. Programmatically construction of
a split BTF on top of a base BTF is supported: one can create an empty split
BTF with btf__new_empty_split() and pass base BTF as an input, or pass raw
binary data to btf__new_split(), or use btf__parse_xxx_split() variants to get
initial set of split types/strings from the ELF file with .BTF section.
String offsets are similarly transparent and are a logical continuation of
base BTF's strings. When building BTF programmatically and adding a new string
(explicitly with btf__add_str() or implicitly through appending new
types/members), string-to-be-added would first be looked up from the base
BTF's string section and re-used if it's there. If not, it will be looked up
and/or added to the split BTF string section. Similarly to type IDs, types in
split BTF can refer to strings from base BTF absolutely transparently (but not
vice versa, of course, because base BTF doesn't "know" about existence of
split BTF).
Internal type index is slightly adjusted to be zero-indexed, ignoring a fake
[0] VOID type. This allows to handle split/base BTF type lookups transparently
by using btf->start_id type ID offset, which is always 1 for base/non-split
BTF and equals btf__get_nr_types(base_btf) + 1 for the split BTF.
BTF deduplication is not yet supported for split BTF and support for it will
be added in separate patch.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201105043402.2530976-5-andrii@kernel.org
This avoids compilation warning if `struct bpf_redir_neigh` is not provided by
other kernel headers.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Bypass CO-RE relocations step for BPF programs that are not going to be
loaded. This allows to have BPF programs compiled in and disabled dynamically
if kernel is not supposed to provide enough relocation information. In such
case, there won't be unnecessary warnings about failed relocations.
Fixes: d929758101fc ("libbpf: Support disabling auto-loading BPF programs")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201008001025.292064-2-andrii@kernel.org
Libbpf doesn't rely on libc_compat.h anymore, so ignore it for the purposes of
syncing libbpf sources into Github.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Andrii Nakryiko