Support for handling BTF data of either endianness was added in [1], but
did not include BTF.ext data for lack of use cases. Later, support for
static linking [2] provided a use case, but this feature and later ones
were restricted to native-endian usage.
Add support for BTF.ext handling in either endianness. Convert BTF.ext data
to native endianness when read into memory for further processing, and
support raw data access that restores the original byte-order for output.
Add internal header functions for byte-swapping func, line, and core info
records.
Add new API functions btf_ext__endianness() and btf_ext__set_endianness()
for query and setting byte-order, as already exist for BTF data.
[1] 3289959b97ca ("libbpf: Support BTF loading and raw data output in both endianness")
[2] 8fd27bf69b86 ("libbpf: Add BPF static linker BTF and BTF.ext support")
Signed-off-by: Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/133407ab20e0dd5c07cab2a6fa7879dee1ffa4bc.1726475448.git.tony.ambardar@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Referenced commit broke the logic of resetting expected_attach_type to
zero for allowed program types if kernel doesn't yet support such field.
We do need to overwrite and preserve expected_attach_type for
multi-uprobe though, but that can be done explicitly in
libbpf_prepare_prog_load().
Fixes: 5902da6d8a52 ("libbpf: Add uprobe multi link support to bpf_program__attach_usdt")
Suggested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240925153012.212866-1-chen.dylane@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reduce log level of BTF loading error to INFO if BTF is not required.
Andrii says:
Nowadays the expectation is that the BPF program will have a valid
.BTF section, so even though .BTF is "optional", I think it's fine
to emit a warning for that case (any reasonably recent Clang will
produce valid BTF).
Ihor's patch is fixing the situation with an outdated host kernel
that doesn't understand BTF. libbpf will try to "upload" the
program's BTF, but if that fails and the BPF object doesn't use
any features that require having BTF uploaded, then it's just an
information message to the user, but otherwise can be ignored.
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@pm.me>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
As reported by Andrii we don't currently recognize uretprobe.multi.s
programs as return probes due to using (wrong) strcmp function.
Using str_has_pfx() instead to match uretprobe.multi prefix.
Tests are passing, because the return program was executed
as entry program and all counts were incremented properly.
Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240910125336.3056271-1-jolsa@kernel.org
We get this with GCC 15 -O3 (at least):
```
libbpf.c: In function ‘bpf_map__init_kern_struct_ops’:
libbpf.c:1109:18: error: ‘mod_btf’ may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
1109 | kern_btf = mod_btf ? mod_btf->btf : obj->btf_vmlinux;
| ~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
libbpf.c:1094:28: note: ‘mod_btf’ was declared here
1094 | struct module_btf *mod_btf;
| ^~~~~~~
In function ‘find_struct_ops_kern_types’,
inlined from ‘bpf_map__init_kern_struct_ops’ at libbpf.c:1102:8:
libbpf.c:982:21: error: ‘btf’ may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
982 | kern_type = btf__type_by_id(btf, kern_type_id);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
libbpf.c: In function ‘bpf_map__init_kern_struct_ops’:
libbpf.c:967:21: note: ‘btf’ was declared here
967 | struct btf *btf;
| ^~~
```
This is similar to the other libbpf fix from a few weeks ago for
the same modelling-errno issue (fab45b962749184e1a1a57c7c583782b78fad539).
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://bugs.gentoo.org/939106
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/f6962729197ae7cdf4f6d1512625bd92f2322d31.1725630494.git.sam@gentoo.org
Hi, fix some spelling errors in libbpf, the details are as follows:
-in the code comments:
termintaing->terminating
architecutre->architecture
requring->requiring
recored->recoded
sanitise->sanities
allowd->allowed
abover->above
see bpf_udst_arg()->see bpf_usdt_arg()
Signed-off-by: Lin Yikai <yikai.lin@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240905110354.3274546-3-yikai.lin@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Currently the only opportunity to set sock ops flags dictating
which callbacks fire for a socket is from within a TCP-BPF sockops
program. This is problematic if the connection is already set up
as there is no further chance to specify callbacks for that socket.
Add TCP_BPF_SOCK_OPS_CB_FLAGS to bpf_setsockopt() and bpf_getsockopt()
to allow users to specify callbacks later, either via an iterator
over sockets or via a socket-specific program triggered by a
setsockopt() on the socket.
Previous discussion on this here [1].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/f42f157b-6e52-dd4d-3d97-9b86c84c0b00@oracle.com/
Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240808150558.1035626-2-alan.maguire@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Kernel/libbpf code is very well tested on s390x in BPF CI, so get rid of
it here as it often is a source of trouble and noise, without really
benefiting us much.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
We do an ugly copying of options in bpf_object__open_skeleton() just to
be able to set object name from skeleton's recorded name (while still
allowing user to override it through opts->object_name).
This is not just ugly, but it also is broken due to memcpy() that
doesn't take into account potential skel_opts' and user-provided opts'
sizes differences due to backward and forward compatibility. This leads
to copying over extra bytes and then failing to validate options
properly. It could, technically, lead also to SIGSEGV, if we are unlucky.
So just get rid of that memory copy completely and instead pass
default object name into bpf_object_open() directly, simplifying all
this significantly. The rule now is that obj_name should be non-NULL for
bpf_object_open() when called with in-memory buffer, so validate that
explicitly as well.
We adopt bpf_object__open_mem() to this as well and generate default
name (based on buffer memory address and size) outside of bpf_object_open().
Fixes: d66562fba1ce ("libbpf: Add BPF object skeleton support")
Reported-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240827203721.1145494-1-andrii@kernel.org
This adds a kfunc wrapper around strncpy_from_user,
which can be called from sleepable BPF programs.
This matches the non-sleepable 'bpf_probe_read_user_str'
helper except it includes an additional 'flags'
param, which allows consumers to clear the entire
destination buffer on success or failure.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Rome <linux@jordanrome.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240823195101.3621028-1-linux@jordanrome.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
In `elf_close`, we get this with GCC 15 -O3 (at least):
```
In function ‘elf_close’,
inlined from ‘elf_close’ at elf.c:53:6,
inlined from ‘elf_find_func_offset_from_file’ at elf.c:384:2:
elf.c:57:9: warning: ‘elf_fd.elf’ may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
57 | elf_end(elf_fd->elf);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
elf.c: In function ‘elf_find_func_offset_from_file’:
elf.c:377:23: note: ‘elf_fd.elf’ was declared here
377 | struct elf_fd elf_fd;
| ^~~~~~
In function ‘elf_close’,
inlined from ‘elf_close’ at elf.c:53:6,
inlined from ‘elf_find_func_offset_from_file’ at elf.c:384:2:
elf.c:58:9: warning: ‘elf_fd.fd’ may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
58 | close(elf_fd->fd);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
elf.c: In function ‘elf_find_func_offset_from_file’:
elf.c:377:23: note: ‘elf_fd.fd’ was declared here
377 | struct elf_fd elf_fd;
| ^~~~~~
```
In reality, our use is fine, it's just that GCC doesn't model errno
here (see linked GCC bug). Suppress -Wmaybe-uninitialized accordingly
by initializing elf_fd.fd to -1 and elf_fd.elf to NULL.
I've done this in two other functions as well given it could easily
occur there too (same access/use pattern).
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/PR114952
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/14ec488a1cac02794c2fa2b83ae0cef1bce2cb36.1723578546.git.sam@gentoo.org
In struct bpf_struct_ops, we have take a pointer to a BTF type name, and
a struct btf_type. This was presumably done for convenience, but can
actually result in subtle and confusing bugs given that BTF data can be
invalidated before a program is loaded. For example, in sched_ext, we
may sometimes resize a data section after a skeleton has been opened,
but before the struct_ops scheduler map has been loaded. This may cause
the BTF data to be realloc'd, which can then cause a UAF when loading
the program because the struct_ops map has pointers directly into the
BTF data.
We're already storing the BTF type_id in struct bpf_struct_ops. Because
type_id is stable, we can therefore just update the places where we were
looking at those pointers to instead do the lookups we need from the
type_id.
Fixes: 590a00888250 ("bpf: libbpf: Add STRUCT_OPS support")
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240724171459.281234-1-void@manifault.com
For all these years libbpf's BTF dumper has been emitting not strictly
valid syntax for function prototypes that have no input arguments.
Instead of `int (*blah)()` we should emit `int (*blah)(void)`.
This is not normally a problem, but it manifests when we get kfuncs in
vmlinux.h that have no input arguments. Due to compiler internal
specifics, we get no BTF information for such kfuncs, if they are not
declared with proper `(void)`.
The fix is trivial. We also need to adjust a few ancient tests that
happily assumed `()` is correct.
Fixes: 351131b51c7a ("libbpf: add btf_dump API for BTF-to-C conversion")
Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240712224442.282823-1-andrii@kernel.org
A new PEBS data source format is introduced for the p-core of Lunar
Lake. The data source field is extended to 8 bits with new encodings.
A new layout is introduced into the union intel_x86_pebs_dse.
Introduce the lnl_latency_data() to parse the new format.
Enlarge the pebs_data_source[] accordingly to include new encodings.
Only the mem load and the mem store events can generate the data source.
Introduce INTEL_HYBRID_LDLAT_CONSTRAINT and
INTEL_HYBRID_STLAT_CONSTRAINT to mark them.
Add two new bits for the new cache-related data src, L2_MHB and MSC.
The L2_MHB is short for L2 Miss Handling Buffer, which is similar to
LFB (Line Fill Buffer), but to track the L2 Cache misses.
The MSC stands for the memory-side cache.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240626143545.480761-6-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
As this will change to a Ubuntu 24.04 runner, we want this to automatically detect
which ubuntu version it is running on.
Signed-off-by: Manu Bretelle <chantr4@gmail.com>
I am working on upgrading to 24.04 runners. In order to make sure that current jobs are scheduled
on Ubuntu 20.04, we need to ask for runners with tag `docker-main`, which is currently
set by those old runners.
Later, we will be able to switch this tag to `docker-noble-main` which are Ubuntu 24.04 runners.
Signed-off-by: Manu Bretelle <chantr4@gmail.com>
Update .mailmap based on libbpf's list of contributors and on the latest
.mailmap version in the upstream repository.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
