Commit Graph
7 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Pu Lehui 9045c3ab53 libbpf: Fix accessing first syscall argument on RV64
On RV64, as Ilya mentioned before [0], the first syscall parameter should be
accessed through orig_a0 (see arch/riscv64/include/asm/syscall.h),
otherwise it will cause selftests like bpf_syscall_macro, vmlinux,
test_lsm, etc. to fail on RV64. Let's fix it by using the struct pt_regs
style CO-RE direct access.

Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220209021745.2215452-1-iii@linux.ibm.com [0]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240831041934.1629216-5-pulehui@huaweicloud.com
2024-10-09 14:13:35 -07:00
Pu Lehui 53a645402f libbpf: Access first syscall argument with CO-RE direct read on arm64
Currently PT_REGS_PARM1 SYSCALL(x) is consistent with PT_REGS_PARM1_CORE
SYSCALL(x), which will introduce the overhead of BPF_CORE_READ(), taking
into account the read pt_regs comes directly from the context, let's use
CO-RE direct read to access the first system call argument.

Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240831041934.1629216-3-pulehui@huaweicloud.com
2024-10-09 14:13:35 -07:00
Pu Lehui 6d01681b02 libbpf: Access first syscall argument with CO-RE direct read on s390
Currently PT_REGS_PARM1 SYSCALL(x) is consistent with PT_REGS_PARM1_CORE
SYSCALL(x), which will introduce the overhead of BPF_CORE_READ(), taking
into account the read pt_regs comes directly from the context, let's use
CO-RE direct read to access the first system call argument.

Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240831041934.1629216-2-pulehui@huaweicloud.com
2024-10-09 14:13:35 -07:00
Pu Lehui 5859c59e50 bpf, cgroup: Reject prog_attach_flags array when effective query
Attach flags is only valid for attached progs of this layer cgroup,
but not for effective progs. For querying with EFFECTIVE flags,
exporting attach flags does not make sense. So when effective query,
we reject prog_attach_flags array and don't need to populate it.
Also we limit attach_flags to output 0 during effective query.

Fixes: b79c9fc9551b ("bpf: implement BPF_PROG_QUERY for BPF_LSM_CGROUP")
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220921104604.2340580-2-pulehui@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2022-09-27 15:23:45 -07:00
Pu Lehui 295a4aae35 bpf, docs: Remove deprecated xsk libbpf APIs description
Since xsk APIs has been removed from libbpf, let's clean up the
BPF docs simutaneously.

Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220708042736.669132-1-pulehui@huawei.com
2022-07-31 16:45:48 -07:00
Pu Lehui eb2b216081 libbpf: Support riscv USDT argument parsing logic
Add riscv-specific USDT argument specification parsing logic.
riscv USDT argument format is shown below:
- Memory dereference case:
  "size@off(reg)", e.g. "-8@-88(s0)"
- Constant value case:
  "size@val", e.g. "4@5"
- Register read case:
  "size@reg", e.g. "-8@a1"

s8 will be marked as poison while it's a reg of riscv, we need
to alias it in advance. Both RV32 and RV64 have been tested.

Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220419145238.482134-3-pulehui@huawei.com
2022-04-27 15:19:08 -07:00
Pu Lehui bddd106e80 libbpf: Fix usdt_cookie being cast to 32 bits
The usdt_cookie is defined as __u64, which should not be
used as a long type because it will be cast to 32 bits
in 32-bit platforms.

Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220419145238.482134-2-pulehui@huawei.com
2022-04-27 15:19:08 -07:00