Make sure that libbpf code always gets FD with O_CLOEXEC flag set,
regardless if file is open through open() or fopen(). For the latter
this means to add "e" to mode string, which is supported since pretty
ancient glibc v2.7.
Also drop the outdated TODO comment in usdt.c, which was already completed.
Suggested-by: Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230525221311.2136408-1-andrii@kernel.org
Current UAPI of BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET commands of bpf() syscall
forces users to specify pinning location as a string-based absolute or
relative (to current working directory) path. This has various
implications related to security (e.g., symlink-based attacks), forces
BPF FS to be exposed in the file system, which can cause races with
other applications.
One of the feedbacks we got from folks working with containers heavily
was that inability to use purely FD-based location specification was an
unfortunate limitation and hindrance for BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET
commands. This patch closes this oversight, adding path_fd field to
BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET UAPI, following conventions established by
*at() syscalls for dirfd + pathname combinations.
This now allows interesting possibilities like working with detached BPF
FS mount (e.g., to perform multiple pinnings without running a risk of
someone interfering with them), and generally making pinning/getting
more secure and not prone to any races and/or security attacks.
This is demonstrated by a selftest added in subsequent patch that takes
advantage of new mount APIs (fsopen, fsconfig, fsmount) to demonstrate
creating detached BPF FS mount, pinning, and then getting BPF map out of
it, all while never exposing this private instance of BPF FS to outside
worlds.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230523170013.728457-4-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
It seems like __builtin_offset() doesn't preserve CO-RE field
relocations properly. So if offsetof() macro is defined through
__builtin_offset(), CO-RE-enabled BPF code using container_of() will be
subtly and silently broken.
To avoid this problem, redefine offsetof() and container_of() in the
form that works with CO-RE relocations more reliably.
Fixes: 5fbc220862fc ("tools/libpf: Add offsetof/container_of macro in bpf_helpers.h")
Reported-by: Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230509065502.2306180-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Mark bpf_iter_num_{new,next,destroy}() kfuncs declared for
bpf_for()/bpf_repeat() macros as __weak to allow users to feature-detect
their presence and guard bpf_for()/bpf_repeat() loops accordingly for
backwards compatibility with old kernels.
Now that libbpf supports kfunc calls poisoning and better reporting of
unresolved (but called) kfuncs, declaring number iterator kfuncs in
bpf_helpers.h won't degrade user experience and won't cause unnecessary
kernel feature dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230418002148.3255690-7-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
To make it easier for bleeding-edge BPF applications, such as sched_ext,
to utilize open-coded iterators, move bpf_for(), bpf_for_each(), and
bpf_repeat() macros from selftests/bpf-internal bpf_misc.h helper, to
libbpf-provided bpf_helpers.h header.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230418002148.3255690-6-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Currently, libbpf leaves `call #0` instruction for __weak unresolved
kfuncs, which might lead to a confusing verifier log situations, where
invalid `call #0` will be treated as successfully validated.
We can do better. Libbpf already has an established mechanism of
poisoning instructions that failed some form of resolution (e.g., CO-RE
relocation and BPF map set to not be auto-created). Libbpf doesn't fail
them outright to allow users to guard them through other means, and as
long as BPF verifier can prove that such poisoned instructions cannot be
ever reached, this doesn't consistute an invalid BPF program. If user
didn't guard such code, libbpf will extract few pieces of information to
tie such poisoned instructions back to additional information about what
entitity wasn't resolved (e.g., BPF map name, or CO-RE relocation
information).
__weak unresolved kfuncs fit this model well, so this patch extends
libbpf with poisioning and log fixup logic for kfunc calls.
Note, this poisoning is done only for kfunc *calls*, not kfunc address
resolution (ldimm64 instructions). The former cannot be ever valid, if
reached, so it's safe to poison them. The latter is a valid mechanism to
check if __weak kfunc ksym was resolved, and do necessary guarding and
work arounds based on this result, supported in most recent kernels. As
such, libbpf keeps such ldimm64 instructions as loading zero, never
poisoning them.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230418002148.3255690-4-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Currently libbpf always reports "kernel" as a source of ksym BTF type,
which is ambiguous given ksym's BTF can come from either vmlinux or
kernel module BTFs. Make this explicit and log module name, if used BTF
is from kernel module.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230418002148.3255690-3-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Normalize internal constants, field names, and comments related to log
fixup. Also add explicit `ext_idx` alias for relocation where relocation
is pointing to extern description for additional information.
No functional changes, just a clean up before subsequent additions.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230418002148.3255690-2-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add output-only log_true_size field to bpf_prog_load_opts to return
bpf_attr->log_true_size value back from bpf() syscall.
Note, that we have to drop const modifier from opts in bpf_prog_load().
This could potentially cause compilation error for some users. But
the usual practice is to define bpf_prog_load_ops
as a local variable next to bpf_prog_load() call and pass pointer to it,
so const vs non-const makes no difference and won't even come up in most
(if not all) cases.
There are no runtime and ABI backwards/forward compatibility issues at all.
If user provides old struct bpf_prog_load_opts, libbpf won't set new
fields. If old libbpf is provided new bpf_prog_load_opts, nothing will
happen either as old libbpf doesn't yet know about this new field.
Adding a new variant of bpf_prog_load() just for this seems like a big
and unnecessary overkill. As a corroborating evidence is the fact that
entire selftests/bpf code base required not adjustment whatsoever.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230406234205.323208-16-andrii@kernel.org
Add output-only log_true_size and btf_log_true_size field to
BPF_PROG_LOAD and BPF_BTF_LOAD commands, respectively. It will return
the size of log buffer necessary to fit in all the log contents at
specified log_level. This is very useful for BPF loader libraries like
libbpf to be able to size log buffer correctly, but could be used by
users directly, if necessary, as well.
This patch plumbs all this through the code, taking into account actual
bpf_attr size provided by user to determine if these new fields are
expected by users. And if they are, set them from kernel on return.
We refactory btf_parse() function to accommodate this, moving attr and
uattr handling inside it. The rest is very straightforward code, which
is split from the logging accounting changes in the previous patch to
make it simpler to review logic vs UAPI changes.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@isovalent.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230406234205.323208-13-andrii@kernel.org
We don't need to archive assets/ subdir when packaging libbpf sources in
retsnoop and veristat repos. Mark assets/ as export-ignore to skip it.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
If user explicitly overrides programs's type with
bpf_program__set_type() API call, we need to disassociate whatever
SEC_DEF handler libbpf determined initially based on program's SEC()
definition, as it's not goind to be valid anymore and could lead to
crashes and/or confusing failures.
Also, fix up bpf_prog_test_load() helper in selftests/bpf, which is
force-setting program type (even if that's completely unnecessary; this
is quite a legacy piece of code), and thus should expect auto-attach to
not work, yet one of the tests explicitly relies on auto-attach for
testing.
Instead, force-set program type only if it differs from the desired one.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230327185202.1929145-2-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Seems like deafult branch was renamed s/master/main/, adopt libbpf CI to
not fail.
Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Seems like upstream LLVM/Clang packaging still has issues with
llvm/clang 17. Fallback to 16 again, for now.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Implement the first open-coded iterator type over a range of integers.
It's public API consists of:
- bpf_iter_num_new() constructor, which accepts [start, end) range
(that is, start is inclusive, end is exclusive).
- bpf_iter_num_next() which will keep returning read-only pointer to int
until the range is exhausted, at which point NULL will be returned.
If bpf_iter_num_next() is kept calling after this, NULL will be
persistently returned.
- bpf_iter_num_destroy() destructor, which needs to be called at some
point to clean up iterator state. BPF verifier enforces that iterator
destructor is called at some point before BPF program exits.
Note that `start = end = X` is a valid combination to setup an empty
iterator. bpf_iter_num_new() will return 0 (success) for any such
combination.
If bpf_iter_num_new() detects invalid combination of input arguments, it
returns error, resets iterator state to, effectively, empty iterator, so
any subsequent call to bpf_iter_num_next() will keep returning NULL.
BPF verifier has no knowledge that returned integers are in the
[start, end) value range, as both `start` and `end` are not statically
known and enforced: they are runtime values.
While the implementation is pretty trivial, some care needs to be taken
to avoid overflows and underflows. Subsequent selftests will validate
correctness of [start, end) semantics, especially around extremes
(INT_MIN and INT_MAX).
Similarly to bpf_loop(), we enforce that no more than BPF_MAX_LOOPS can
be specified.
bpf_iter_num_{new,next,destroy}() is a logical evolution from bounded
BPF loops and bpf_loop() helper and is the basis for implementing
ergonomic BPF loops with no statically known or verified bounds.
Subsequent patches implement bpf_for() macro, demonstrating how this can
be wrapped into something that works and feels like a normal for() loop
in C language.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308184121.1165081-5-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Each architecture supports at least 6 syscall argument registers, so now
that specs for each architecture is defined in bpf_tracing.h, remove
unnecessary macro overrides, which previously were required to keep
existing BPF_KSYSCALL() uses compiling and working.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230120200914.3008030-26-andrii@kernel.org
Set up generic support in bpf_tracing.h for up to 7 syscall arguments
tracing with BPF_KSYSCALL, which seems to be the limit according to
syscall(2) manpage. Also change the way that syscall convention is
specified to be more explicit. Subsequent patches will adjust and define
proper per-architecture syscall conventions.
__PT_PARM1_SYSCALL_REG through __PT_PARM6_SYSCALL_REG is added
temporarily to keep everything working before each architecture has
syscall reg tables defined. They will be removed afterwards.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> # arm64
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230120200914.3008030-13-andrii@kernel.org
Add BPF_UPROBE and BPF_URETPROBE macros, aliased to BPF_KPROBE and
BPF_KRETPROBE, respectively. This makes uprobe-based BPF program code
much less confusing, especially to people new to tracing, at no cost in
terms of maintainability. We'll use this macro in selftests in
subsequent patch.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230120200914.3008030-11-andrii@kernel.org
Add BPF_KPROBE() and PT_REGS_PARMx() support for up to 8 arguments, if
target architecture supports this. Currently all architectures are
limited to only 5 register-placed arguments, which is limiting even on
x86-64.
This patch adds generic macro machinery to support up to 8 arguments
both when explicitly fetching it from pt_regs through PT_REGS_PARMx()
macros, as well as more ergonomic access in BPF_KPROBE().
Also, for i386 architecture we now don't have to define fake PARM4 and
PARM5 definitions, they will be generically substituted, just like for
PARM6 through PARM8.
Subsequent patches will fill out architecture-specific definitions,
where appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> # arm64
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> # s390x
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230120200914.3008030-2-andrii@kernel.org
Fix bug in btf_dump's logic of determining if a given struct type is
packed or not. The notion of "natural alignment" is not needed and is
even harmful in this case, so drop it altogether. The biggest difference
in btf_is_struct_packed() compared to its original implementation is
that we don't really use btf__align_of() to determine overall alignment
of a struct type (because it could be 1 for both packed and non-packed
struct, depending on specifci field definitions), and just use field's
actual alignment to calculate whether any field is requiring packing or
struct's size overall necessitates packing.
Add two simple test cases that demonstrate the difference this change
would make.
Fixes: ea2ce1ba99aa ("libbpf: Fix BTF-to-C converter's padding logic")
Reported-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221215183605.4149488-1-andrii@kernel.org
Turns out that btf_dump API doesn't handle a bunch of tricky corner
cases, as reported by Per, and further discovered using his testing
Python script ([0]).
This patch revamps btf_dump's padding logic significantly, making it
more correct and also avoiding unnecessary explicit padding, where
compiler would pad naturally. This overall topic turned out to be very
tricky and subtle, there are lots of subtle corner cases. The comments
in the code tries to give some clues, but comments themselves are
supposed to be paired with good understanding of C alignment and padding
rules. Plus some experimentation to figure out subtle things like
whether `long :0;` means that struct is now forced to be long-aligned
(no, it's not, turns out).
Anyways, Per's script, while not completely correct in some known
situations, doesn't show any obvious cases where this logic breaks, so
this is a nice improvement over the previous state of this logic.
Some selftests had to be adjusted to accommodate better use of natural
alignment rules, eliminating some unnecessary padding, or changing it to
`type: 0;` alignment markers.
Note also that for when we are in between bitfields, we emit explicit
bit size, while otherwise we use `: 0`, this feels much more natural in
practice.
Next patch will add few more test cases, found through randomized Per's
script.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/85f83c333f5355c8ac026f835b18d15060725fcb.camel@ericsson.com/
Reported-by: Per Sundström XP <per.xp.sundstrom@ericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221212211505.558851-6-andrii@kernel.org
btf__align_of() is supposed to be return alignment requirement of
a requested BTF type. For STRUCT/UNION it doesn't always return correct
value, because it calculates alignment only based on field types. But
for packed structs this is not enough, we need to also check field
offsets and struct size. If field offset isn't aligned according to
field type's natural alignment, then struct must be packed. Similarly,
if struct size is not a multiple of struct's natural alignment, then
struct must be packed as well.
This patch fixes this issue precisely by additionally checking these
conditions.
Fixes: 3d208f4ca111 ("libbpf: Expose btf__align_of() API")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221212211505.558851-5-andrii@kernel.org
Turns out C allows to force enum to be 1-byte or 8-byte explicitly using
mode(byte) or mode(word), respecticely. Linux sources are using this in
some cases. This is imporant to handle correctly, as enum size
determines corresponding fields in a struct that use that enum type. And
if enum size is incorrect, this will lead to invalid struct layout. So
add mode(byte) and mode(word) attribute support to btf_dump APIs.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221212211505.558851-3-andrii@kernel.org
btf_dump APIs emit unnecessary tabs when emitting struct/union
definition that fits on the single line. Before this patch we'd get:
struct blah {<tab>};
This patch fixes this and makes sure that we get more natural:
struct blah {};
Fixes: 44a726c3f23c ("bpftool: Print newline before '}' for struct with padding only fields")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221212211505.558851-2-andrii@kernel.org
Having too new build environment in workflows that build selftests on
the host, but run them in a separate QEMU image can lead to problems
with runtime linker complaining about missing new enough version of
glibc and other dependencies.
Until we update images, fix used Ubuntu version to ubuntu-20.04 to
mitigate.
Suggested-by: Manu Bretelle <chantr4@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
C++ enum forward declarations are fundamentally not compatible with pure
C enum definitions, and so libbpf's use of `enum bpf_stats_type;`
forward declaration in libbpf/bpf.h public API header is causing C++
compilation issues.
More details can be found in [0], but it comes down to C++ supporting
enum forward declaration only with explicitly specified backing type:
enum bpf_stats_type: int;
In C (and I believe it's a GCC extension also), such forward declaration
is simply:
enum bpf_stats_type;
Further, in Linux UAPI this enum is defined in pure C way:
enum bpf_stats_type { BPF_STATS_RUN_TIME = 0; }
And even though in both cases backing type is int, which can be
confirmed by looking at DWARF information, for C++ compiler actual enum
definition and forward declaration are incompatible.
To eliminate this problem, for C++ mode define input argument as int,
which makes enum unnecessary in libbpf public header. This solves the
issue and as demonstrated by next patch doesn't cause any unwanted
compiler warnings, at least with default warnings setting.
[0] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42766839/c11-enum-forward-causes-underlying-type-mismatch
[1] Closes: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/issues/249
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221130200013.2997831-1-andrii@kernel.org
After recent lint changes, commit_signature() function now gets optional
array of paths as multiple arguments, instead of entire array as second
argument. So adjust commit_signature() to handle this correctly.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Now that we enforce Signed-off-by on every commit, make sure that
auto-generatd sync commits also get corrected Signed-off-by tags.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Libbpf relies on F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC constant coming from fcntl.h UAPI
header, so we need to sync it along other UAPI headers. Also update sync
script to keep doing this automatically going forward.
Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Use correct Bash syntax to define these two variables as arrays.
Drop shellcheck opt-out for unquoted use of array.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Don't wrap LIBBPF_PATHS[@] and LIBBPF_VIEW_PATHS[@] in quotes when
passing it to git commands. Not clear how it worked before, but
something recently broke. Either git commands became stricter or
something.
But either way, we do want to pass each element of LIBBPF_PATHS or
LIBBPF_VIEW_PATHS as separate command line arguments, so putting them in
quotes doesn't make sense, as that makes them look like a single
argument to git.
So drop all the quotes around these arrays. The only place where it's
still needed is in commit_signature call, as we do want to pass array as
single arg ($2) and then internally we unfold it into multiple command
line arguments.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Syncing latest libbpf commits from kernel repository.
Baseline bpf-next commit: 62c69e89e81bfbdb9a87ae3e0599dcc6aacf786b
Checkpoint bpf-next commit: b548b17a93fd18357a5a6f535c10c1e68719ad32
Baseline bpf commit: e7b09357453a99e6f9e74c39e9ca1363c22c0b96
Checkpoint bpf commit: 9cbd48d5fa14e4c65f8580de16686077f7cea02b
Alan Maguire (1):
libbpf: Btf dedup identical struct test needs check for nested
structs/arrays
Andrii Nakryiko (2):
libbpf: clean up and refactor BTF fixup step
libbpf: only add BPF_F_MMAPABLE flag for data maps with global vars
Anshuman Khandual (4):
perf: Add system error and not in transaction branch types
perf: Extend branch type classification
perf: Capture branch privilege information
perf: Add PERF_BR_NEW_ARCH_[N] map for BRBE on arm64 platform
Eduard Zingerman (4):
libbpf: Resolve enum fwd as full enum64 and vice versa
libbpf: Hashmap interface update to allow both long and void*
keys/values
libbpf: Resolve unambigous forward declarations
libbpf: Hashmap.h update to fix build issues using LLVM14
Martin KaFai Lau (1):
bpf: Add hwtstamp field for the sockops prog
Namhyung Kim (1):
perf: Kill __PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN_EARLY
Ravi Bangoria (3):
perf/mem: Introduce PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_{EXTN_MEM|IO}
perf/uapi: Define PERF_MEM_SNOOPX_PEER in kernel header file
perf/mem: Rename PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_EXTN_MEM to PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_CXL
Sandipan Das (1):
perf/core: Add speculation info to branch entries
Xu Kuohai (1):
libbpf: Avoid allocating reg_name with sscanf in parse_usdt_arg()
Yonghong Song (2):
bpf: Implement cgroup storage available to non-cgroup-attached bpf
progs
libbpf: Support new cgroup local storage
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 51 +++++-
include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 57 ++++++-
src/btf.c | 267 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
src/btf_dump.c | 15 +-
src/hashmap.c | 18 +--
src/hashmap.h | 91 +++++++----
src/libbpf.c | 196 ++++++++++++++---------
src/libbpf_probes.c | 1 +
src/strset.c | 18 +--
src/usdt.c | 44 +++---
10 files changed, 511 insertions(+), 247 deletions(-)
--
2.30.2
Teach libbpf to not add BPF_F_MMAPABLE flag unnecessarily for ARRAY maps
that are backing data sections, if such data sections don't expose any
variables to user-space. Exposed variables are those that have
STB_GLOBAL or STB_WEAK ELF binding and correspond to BTF VAR's
BTF_VAR_GLOBAL_ALLOCATED linkage.
The overall idea is that if some data section doesn't have any variable that
is exposed through BPF skeleton, then there is no reason to make such
BPF array mmapable. Making BPF array mmapable is not a free no-op
action, because BPF verifier doesn't allow users to put special objects
(such as BPF spin locks, RB tree nodes, linked list nodes, kptrs, etc;
anything that has a sensitive internal state that should not be modified
arbitrarily from user space) into mmapable arrays, as there is no way to
prevent user space from corrupting such sensitive state through direct
memory access through memory-mapped region.
By making sure that libbpf doesn't add BPF_F_MMAPABLE flag to BPF array
maps corresponding to data sections that only have static variables
(which are not supposed to be visible to user space according to libbpf
and BPF skeleton rules), users now can have spinlocks, kptrs, etc in
either default .bss/.data sections or custom .data.* sections (assuming
there are no global variables in such sections).
The only possible hiccup with this approach is the need to use global
variables during BPF static linking, even if it's not intended to be
shared with user space through BPF skeleton. To allow such scenarios,
extend libbpf's STV_HIDDEN ELF visibility attribute handling to
variables. Libbpf is already treating global hidden BPF subprograms as
static subprograms and adjusts BTF accordingly to make BPF verifier
verify such subprograms as static subprograms with preserving entire BPF
verifier state between subprog calls. This patch teaches libbpf to treat
global hidden variables as static ones and adjust BTF information
accordingly as well. This allows to share variables between multiple
object files during static linking, but still keep them internal to BPF
program and not get them exposed through BPF skeleton.
Note, that if the user has some advanced scenario where they absolutely
need BPF_F_MMAPABLE flag on .data/.bss/.rodata BPF array map despite
only having static variables, they still can achieve this by forcing it
through explicit bpf_map__set_map_flags() API.
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221019002816.359650-3-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Refactor libbpf's BTF fixup step during BPF object open phase. The only
functional change is that we now ignore BTF_VAR_GLOBAL_EXTERN variables
during fix up, not just BTF_VAR_STATIC ones, which shouldn't cause any
change in behavior as there shouldn't be any extern variable in data
sections for valid BPF object anyways.
Otherwise it's just collapsing two functions that have no reason to be
separate, and switching find_elf_var_offset() helper to return entire
symbol pointer, not just its offset. This will be used by next patch to
get ELF symbol visibility.
While refactoring, also "normalize" debug messages inside
btf_fixup_datasec() to follow general libbpf style and print out data
section name consistently, where it's available.
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221019002816.359650-2-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Historically enum bpf_func_id's BPF_FUNC_xxx enumerators relied on
implicit sequential values being assigned by compiler. This is
convenient, as new BPF helpers are always added at the very end, but it
also has its downsides, some of them being:
- with over 200 helpers now it's very hard to know what's each helper's ID,
which is often important to know when working with BPF assembly (e.g.,
by dumping raw bpf assembly instructions with llvm-objdump -d
command). it's possible to work around this by looking into vmlinux.h,
dumping /sys/btf/kernel/vmlinux, looking at libbpf-provided
bpf_helper_defs.h, etc. But it always feels like an unnecessary step
and one should be able to quickly figure this out from UAPI header.
- when backporting and cherry-picking only some BPF helpers onto older
kernels it's important to be able to skip some enum values for helpers
that weren't backported, but preserve absolute integer IDs to keep BPF
helper IDs stable so that BPF programs stay portable across upstream
and backported kernels.
While neither problem is insurmountable, they come up frequently enough
and are annoying enough to warrant improving the situation. And for the
backporting the problem can easily go unnoticed for a while, especially
if backport is done with people not very familiar with BPF subsystem overall.
Anyways, it's easy to fix this by making sure that __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER
macro provides explicit helper IDs. Unfortunately that would potentially
break existing users that use UAPI-exposed __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER and are
expected to pass macro that accepts only symbolic helper identifier
(e.g., map_lookup_elem for bpf_map_lookup_elem() helper).
As such, we need to introduce a new macro (___BPF_FUNC_MAPPER) which
would specify both identifier and integer ID, but in such a way as to
allow existing __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER be expressed in terms of new
___BPF_FUNC_MAPPER macro. And that's what this patch is doing. To avoid
duplication and allow __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER stay *exactly* the same,
___BPF_FUNC_MAPPER accepts arbitrary "context" arguments, which can be
used to pass any extra macros, arguments, and whatnot. In our case we
use this to pass original user-provided macro that expects single
argument and __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER is using it's own three-argument
__BPF_FUNC_MAPPER_APPLY intermediate macro to impedance-match new and
old "callback" macros.
Once we resolve this, we use new ___BPF_FUNC_MAPPER to define enum
bpf_func_id with explicit values. The other users of __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER
in kernel (namely in kernel/bpf/disasm.c) are kept exactly the same both
as demonstration that backwards compat works, but also to avoid
unnecessary code churn.
Note that new ___BPF_FUNC_MAPPER() doesn't forcefully insert comma
between values, as that might not be appropriate in all possible cases
where ___BPF_FUNC_MAPPER might be used by users. This doesn't reduce
usability, as it's trivial to insert that comma inside "callback" macro.
To validate all the manually specified IDs are exactly right, we used
BTF to compare before and after values:
$ bpftool btf dump file ~/linux-build/default/vmlinux | rg bpf_func_id -A 211 > after.txt
$ git stash # stach UAPI changes
$ make -j90
... re-building kernel without UAPI changes ...
$ bpftool btf dump file ~/linux-build/default/vmlinux | rg bpf_func_id -A 211 > before.txt
$ diff -u before.txt after.txt
--- before.txt 2022-10-05 10:48:18.119195916 -0700
+++ after.txt 2022-10-05 10:46:49.446615025 -0700
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-[14576] ENUM 'bpf_func_id' encoding=UNSIGNED size=4 vlen=211
+[9560] ENUM 'bpf_func_id' encoding=UNSIGNED size=4 vlen=211
'BPF_FUNC_unspec' val=0
'BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem' val=1
'BPF_FUNC_map_update_elem' val=2
As can be seen from diff above, the only thing that changed was resulting BTF
type ID of ENUM bpf_func_id, not any of the enumerators, their names or integer
values.
The only other place that needed fixing was scripts/bpf_doc.py used to generate
man pages and bpf_helper_defs.h header for libbpf and selftests. That script is
tightly-coupled to exact shape of ___BPF_FUNC_MAPPER macro definition, so had
to be trivially adapted.
Cc: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Reported-by: Andrea Terzolo <andrea.terzolo@polito.it>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221006042452.2089843-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Drop the requirement for system-wide kernel UAPI headers to provide full
struct btf_enum64 definition. This is an unexpected requirement that
slipped in libbpf 1.0 and put unnecessary pressure ([0]) on users to have
a bleeding-edge kernel UAPI header from unreleased Linux 6.0.
To achieve this, we forward declare struct btf_enum64. But that's not
enough as there is btf_enum64_value() helper that expects to know the
layout of struct btf_enum64. So we get a bit creative with
reinterpreting memory layout as array of __u32 and accesing lo32/hi32
fields as array elements. Alternative way would be to have a local
pointer variable for anonymous struct with exactly the same layout as
struct btf_enum64, but that gets us into C++ compiler errors complaining
about invalid type casts. So play it safe, if ugly.
[0] Closes: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/issues/562
Fixes: d90ec262b35b ("libbpf: Add enum64 support for btf_dump")
Reported-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220927042940.147185-1-andrii@kernel.org
When attach_prog_fd field was removed in libbpf 1.0 and replaced with
`long: 0` placeholder, it actually shifted all the subsequent fields by
8 byte. This is due to `long: 0` promising to adjust next field's offset
to long-aligned offset. But in this case we were already long-aligned
as pin_root_path is a pointer. So `long: 0` had no effect, and thus
didn't feel the gap created by removed attach_prog_fd.
Non-zero bitfield should have been used instead. I validated using
pahole. Originally kconfig field was at offset 40. With `long: 0` it's
at offset 32, which is wrong. With this change it's back at offset 40.
While technically libbpf 1.0 is allowed to break backwards
compatibility and applications should have been recompiled against
libbpf 1.0 headers, but given how trivial it is to preserve memory
layout, let's fix this.
Reported-by: Grant Seltzer Richman <grantseltzer@gmail.com>
Fixes: 146bf811f5ac ("libbpf: remove most other deprecated high-level APIs")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220923230559.666608-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Fix SIGSEGV caused by libbpf trying to find attach type in vmlinux BTF
for freplace programs. It's wrong to search in vmlinux BTF and libbpf
doesn't even mark vmlinux BTF as required for freplace programs. So
trying to search anything in obj->vmlinux_btf might cause NULL
dereference if nothing else in BPF object requires vmlinux BTF.
Instead, error out if freplace (EXT) program doesn't specify
attach_prog_fd during at the load time.
Fixes: 91abb4a6d79d ("libbpf: Support attachment of BPF tracing programs to kernel modules")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220909193053.577111-3-andrii@kernel.org
Add auto-selectable libbpf logo for light and dark themes.
Suggested-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Add three layouts of libbpf logos (sparse, compact, sideways) with three
color variants (light bg, dark bg, monochrome).
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Add libbpf logo to the header and restructure and rewrite a bit
intro part about libbpf, it's bpf-next origins, etc.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Andrii Nakryiko