ringbuf_process_ring() return int64_t, while ring__consume_n() assigns
it to int. It's highly unlikely, but possible for ringbuf_process_ring()
to return value larger than INT_MAX, so use int64_t. ring__consume_n()
does check INT_MAX before returning int result to the user.
Fixes: 4d22ea94ea33 ("libbpf: Add ring__consume_n / ring_buffer__consume_n")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240430201952.888293-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
In commit 4794f18bf4 ("sync: Sync .mailmap entries"), we updated the
sync-up script to automatically update libbpf's .mailmap; however, the
script would not take care of committing the changes. Let's address
this.
The code is copied and adapted from the part where we commit changes to
src/bpf_helper_defs.h.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
Previous attempt to fix the handling of nulled-out (from skeleton)
struct_ops program is working well only if struct_ops program is defined
as non-autoloaded by default (i.e., has SEC("?struct_ops") annotation,
with question mark).
Unfortunately, that fix is incomplete due to how
bpf_object_adjust_struct_ops_autoload() is marking referenced or
non-referenced struct_ops program as autoloaded (or not). Because
bpf_object_adjust_struct_ops_autoload() is run after
bpf_map__init_kern_struct_ops() step, which sets program slot to NULL,
such programs won't be considered "referenced", and so its autoload
property won't be changed.
This all sounds convoluted and it is, but the desire is to have as
natural behavior (as far as struct_ops usage is concerned) as possible.
This fix is redoing the original fix but makes it work for
autoloaded-by-default struct_ops programs as well. We achieve this by
forcing prog->autoload to false if prog was declaratively set for some
struct_ops map, but then nulled-out from skeleton (programmatically).
This achieves desired effect of not autoloading it. If such program is
still referenced somewhere else (different struct_ops map or different
callback field), it will get its autoload property adjusted by
bpf_object_adjust_struct_ops_autoload() later.
We also fix selftest, which accidentally used SEC("?struct_ops")
annotation. It was meant to use autoload-by-default program from the
very beginning.
Fixes: f973fccd43d3 ("libbpf: handle nulled-out program in struct_ops correctly")
Cc: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240501041706.3712608-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
In some situations, it is useful to explicitly specify a kernel module
to search for a tracing program target (e.g. when a function of the same
name exists in multiple modules or in vmlinux).
This patch enables that by allowing the "module:function" syntax for the
find_kernel_btf_id function. Thanks to this, the syntax can be used both
from a SEC macro (i.e. `SEC(fentry/module:function)`) and via the
bpf_program__set_attach_target API call.
Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/9085a8cb9a552de98e554deb22ff7e977d025440.1714469650.git.vmalik@redhat.com
Adding support to attach program in kprobe session mode
with bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts function.
Adding session bool to bpf_kprobe_multi_opts struct that allows
to load and attach the bpf program via kprobe session.
the attachment to create kprobe multi session.
Also adding new program loader section that allows:
SEC("kprobe.session/bpf_fentry_test*")
and loads/attaches kprobe program as kprobe session.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240430112830.1184228-5-jolsa@kernel.org
Adding support to attach bpf program for entry and return probe
of the same function. This is common use case which at the moment
requires to create two kprobe multi links.
Adding new BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_SESSION attach type that instructs
kernel to attach single link program to both entry and exit probe.
It's possible to control execution of the bpf program on return
probe simply by returning zero or non zero from the entry bpf
program execution to execute or not the bpf program on return
probe respectively.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240430112830.1184228-2-jolsa@kernel.org
If struct_ops has one of program callbacks set declaratively and host
kernel is old and doesn't support this callback, libbpf will allow to
load such struct_ops as long as that callback was explicitly nulled-out
(presumably through skeleton). This is all working correctly, except we
won't reset corresponding program slot to NULL before bailing out, which
will lead to libbpf not detecting that BPF program has to be not
auto-loaded. Fix this by unconditionally resetting corresponding program
slot to NULL.
Fixes: c911fc61a7ce ("libbpf: Skip zeroed or null fields if not found in the kernel type.")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240428030954.3918764-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
The definition of bpf_tail_call_static in tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
is guarded by a preprocessor check to assure that clang is recent
enough to support it. This patch updates the guard so the function is
compiled when using GCC 13 or later as well.
Tested in bpf-next master. No regressions.
Signed-off-by: Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240426145158.14409-1-jose.marchesi@oracle.com
Two important arguments in RTT estimation, mrtt and srtt, are passed to
tcp_bpf_rtt(), so that bpf programs get more information about RTT
computation in BPF_SOCK_OPS_RTT_CB.
The difference between bpf_sock_ops->srtt_us and the srtt here is: the
former is an old rtt before update, while srtt passed by tcp_bpf_rtt()
is that after update.
Signed-off-by: Philo Lu <lulie@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240425161724.73707-2-lulie@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
The kernel repository has a .mailmap file to remap author names and
email addresses to their desired format in Git logs (for details, see
gitmailmap documentation [0]). Alas, this is only visible for author
information when looking at the logs locally, as GitHub does not support
mailmaps at the moment [1].
This commit adds a .mailmap file for libbpf, automatically generated
from the kernel's version. The script to generate the .mailmap is added,
too: it works by grepping email addresses from authors in the
repository, and collecting all lines ending with this address in the
kernel's .mailmap - in other words, all lines where this address is used
as a pattern for a remapping.
To keep the .mailmap up-to-date, add a call to the script to
sync-kernel.sh.
[0] https://git-scm.com/docs/gitmailmap
[1] https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/22518
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
When dumping a character array, libbpf will watch for a '\0' and set
is_array_terminated=true if found. This prevents libbpf from printing
the remaining characters of the array, treating it as a nul-terminated
string.
However, once this flag is set, it's never reset, leading to subsequent
characters array not being printed properly:
.str_multi = (__u8[2][16])[
[
'H',
'e',
'l',
],
],
This patch saves the is_array_terminated flag and restores its
default (false) value before looping over the elements of an array,
then restores it afterward. This way, libbpf's behavior is unchanged
when dumping the characters of an array, but subsequent arrays are
printed properly:
.str_multi = (__u8[2][16])[
[
'H',
'e',
'l',
],
[
'l',
'o',
],
],
Signed-off-by: Quentin Deslandes <qde@naccy.de>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240413211258.134421-3-qde@naccy.de
In btf_dump_array_data(), libbpf will call btf_dump_dump_type_data() for
each element. For an array of characters, each element will be
processed the following way:
- btf_dump_dump_type_data() is called to print the character
- btf_dump_data_pfx() prefixes the current line with the proper number
of indentations
- btf_dump_int_data() is called to print the character
- After the last character is printed, btf_dump_dump_type_data() calls
btf_dump_data_pfx() before writing the closing bracket
However, for an array containing characters, btf_dump_int_data() won't
print any '\0' and subsequent characters. This leads to situations where
the line prefix is written, no character is added, then the prefix is
written again before adding the closing bracket:
(struct sk_metadata){
.str_array = (__u8[14])[
'H',
'e',
'l',
'l',
'o',
],
This change solves this issue by printing the '\0' character, which
has two benefits:
- The bracket closing the array is properly aligned
- It's clear from a user point of view that libbpf uses '\0' as a
terminator for arrays of characters.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Deslandes <qde@naccy.de>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240413211258.134421-2-qde@naccy.de
Add bpf_link support for sk_msg and sk_skb programs. We have an
internal request to support bpf_link for sk_msg programs so user
space can have a uniform handling with bpf_link based libbpf
APIs. Using bpf_link based libbpf API also has a benefit which
makes system robust by decoupling prog life cycle and
attachment life cycle.
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240410043527.3737160-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
In some cases, instead of always consuming all items from ring buffers
in a greedy way, we may want to consume up to a certain amount of items,
for example when we need to copy items from the BPF ring buffer to a
limited user buffer.
This change allows to set an upper limit to the amount of items consumed
from one or more ring buffers.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240406092005.92399-3-andrea.righi@canonical.com
The struct bpf_fib_lookup is supposed to be of size 64. A recent commit
59b418c7063d ("bpf: Add a check for struct bpf_fib_lookup size") added
a static assertion to check this property so that future changes to the
structure will not accidentally break this assumption.
As it immediately turned out, on some 32-bit arm systems, when AEABI=n,
the total size of the structure was equal to 68, see [1]. This happened
because the bpf_fib_lookup structure contains a union of two 16-bit
fields:
union {
__u16 tot_len;
__u16 mtu_result;
};
which was supposed to compile to a 16-bit-aligned 16-bit field. On the
aforementioned setups it was instead both aligned and padded to 32-bits.
Declare this inner union as __attribute__((packed, aligned(2))) such
that it always is of size 2 and is aligned to 16 bits.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYtsoP51f-oP_Sp5MOq-Ffv8La2RztNpwvE6+R1VtFiLrw@mail.gmail.com/#t
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Fixes: e1850ea9bd9e ("bpf: bpf_fib_lookup return MTU value as output when looked up")
Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov <aspsk@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240403123303.1452184-1-aspsk@isovalent.com
With CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_THIN enabled, with some of previous
version of kernel code base ([1]), I hit the following
error:
test_ksyms:PASS:kallsyms_fopen 0 nsec
test_ksyms:FAIL:ksym_find symbol 'bpf_link_fops' not found
#118 ksyms:FAIL
The reason is that 'bpf_link_fops' is renamed to
bpf_link_fops.llvm.8325593422554671469
Due to cross-file inlining, the static variable 'bpf_link_fops'
in syscall.c is used by a function in another file. To avoid
potential duplicated names, the llvm added suffix
'.llvm.<hash>' ([2]) to 'bpf_link_fops' variable.
Such renaming caused a problem in libbpf if 'bpf_link_fops'
is used in bpf prog as a ksym but 'bpf_link_fops' does not
match any symbol in /proc/kallsyms.
To fix this issue, libbpf needs to understand that suffix '.llvm.<hash>'
is caused by clang lto kernel and to process such symbols properly.
With latest bpf-next code base built with CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_THIN,
I cannot reproduce the above failure any more. But such an issue
could happen with other symbols or in the future for bpf_link_fops symbol.
For example, with my current kernel, I got the following from
/proc/kallsyms:
ffffffff84782154 d __func__.net_ratelimit.llvm.6135436931166841955
ffffffff85f0a500 d tk_core.llvm.726630847145216431
ffffffff85fdb960 d __fs_reclaim_map.llvm.10487989720912350772
ffffffff864c7300 d fake_dst_ops.llvm.54750082607048300
I could not easily create a selftest to test newly-added
libbpf functionality with a static C test since I do not know
which symbol is cross-file inlined. But based on my particular kernel,
the following test change can run successfully.
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksyms.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksyms.c
> index 6a86d1f07800..904a103f7b1d 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksyms.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksyms.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ void test_ksyms(void)
> ASSERT_EQ(data->out__bpf_link_fops, link_fops_addr, "bpf_link_fops");
> ASSERT_EQ(data->out__bpf_link_fops1, 0, "bpf_link_fops1");
> ASSERT_EQ(data->out__btf_size, btf_size, "btf_size");
> + ASSERT_NEQ(data->out__fake_dst_ops, 0, "fake_dst_ops");
> ASSERT_EQ(data->out__per_cpu_start, per_cpu_start_addr, "__per_cpu_start");
>
> cleanup:
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ksyms.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ksyms.c
> index 6c9cbb5a3bdf..fe91eef54b66 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ksyms.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ksyms.c
> @@ -9,11 +9,13 @@ __u64 out__bpf_link_fops = -1;
> __u64 out__bpf_link_fops1 = -1;
> __u64 out__btf_size = -1;
> __u64 out__per_cpu_start = -1;
> +__u64 out__fake_dst_ops = -1;
>
> extern const void bpf_link_fops __ksym;
> extern const void __start_BTF __ksym;
> extern const void __stop_BTF __ksym;
> extern const void __per_cpu_start __ksym;
> +extern const void fake_dst_ops __ksym;
> /* non-existing symbol, weak, default to zero */
> extern const void bpf_link_fops1 __ksym __weak;
>
> @@ -23,6 +25,7 @@ int handler(const void *ctx)
> out__bpf_link_fops = (__u64)&bpf_link_fops;
> out__btf_size = (__u64)(&__stop_BTF - &__start_BTF);
> out__per_cpu_start = (__u64)&__per_cpu_start;
> + out__fake_dst_ops = (__u64)&fake_dst_ops;
>
> out__bpf_link_fops1 = (__u64)&bpf_link_fops1;
This patch fixed the issue in libbpf such that
the suffix '.llvm.<hash>' will be ignored during comparison of
bpf prog ksym vs. symbols in /proc/kallsyms, this resolved the issue.
Currently, only static variables in /proc/kallsyms are checked
with '.llvm.<hash>' suffix since in bpf programs function ksyms
with '.llvm.<hash>' suffix are most likely kfunc's and unlikely
to be cross-file inlined.
Note that currently kernel does not support gcc build with lto.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240302165017.1627295-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev/
[2] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/release/18.x/llvm/include/llvm/IR/ModuleSummaryIndex.h#L1714-L1719
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240326041458.1198161-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
BPF verifier emits "unknown func" message when given BPF program type
does not support BPF helper. This message may be confusing for users, as
important context that helper is unknown only to current program type is
not provided.
This patch changes message to "program of this type cannot use helper "
and aligns dependent code in libbpf and tests. Any suggestions on
improving/changing this message are welcome.
Signed-off-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240325152210.377548-1-yatsenko@meta.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Since its going directly to the syscall to avoid not having
memfd_create() available in some systems, do the same for its
MFD_CLOEXEC flags, defining it if not available.
This fixes the build in those systems, noticed while building perf on a
set of build containers.
Fixes: 9fa5e1a180aa639f ("libbpf: Call memfd_create() syscall directly")
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ZfxZ9nCyKvwmpKkE@x1
It's been reported that (void *)map->map_extra is causing compilation
warnings on 32-bit architectures. It's easy enough to fix this by
casting to long first.
Fixes: 79ff13e99169 ("libbpf: Add support for bpf_arena.")
Reported-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Message-ID: <20240319215143.1279312-1-andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The selftests use
to tell LLVM about special pointers. For LLVM there is nothing "arena"
about them. They are simply pointers in a different address space.
Hence LLVM diff https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85161 renamed:
. macro __BPF_FEATURE_ARENA_CAST -> __BPF_FEATURE_ADDR_SPACE_CAST
. global variables in __attribute__((address_space(N))) are now
placed in section named ".addr_space.N" instead of ".arena.N".
Adjust libbpf, bpftool, and selftests to match LLVM.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240315021834.62988-3-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
