Andrii Nakryiko 3102067b4e libbpf: implement __arg_ctx fallback logic
Out of all special global func arg tag annotations, __arg_ctx is
practically is the most immediately useful and most critical to have
working across multitude kernel version, if possible. This would allow
end users to write much simpler code if __arg_ctx semantics worked for
older kernels that don't natively understand btf_decl_tag("arg:ctx") in
verifier logic.

Luckily, it is possible to ensure __arg_ctx works on old kernels through
a bit of extra work done by libbpf, at least in a lot of common cases.

To explain the overall idea, we need to go back at how context argument
was supported in global funcs before __arg_ctx support was added. This
was done based on special struct name checks in kernel. E.g., for
BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT the expectation is that argument type `struct
bpf_perf_event_data *` mark that argument as PTR_TO_CTX. This is all
good as long as global function is used from the same BPF program types
only, which is often not the case. If the same subprog has to be called
from, say, kprobe and perf_event program types, there is no single
definition that would satisfy BPF verifier. Subprog will have context
argument either for kprobe (if using bpf_user_pt_regs_t struct name) or
perf_event (with bpf_perf_event_data struct name), but not both.

This limitation was the reason to add btf_decl_tag("arg:ctx"), making
the actual argument type not important, so that user can just define
"generic" signature:

  __noinline int global_subprog(void *ctx __arg_ctx) { ... }

I won't belabor how libbpf is implementing subprograms, see a huge
comment next to bpf_object_relocate_calls() function. The idea is that
each main/entry BPF program gets its own copy of global_subprog's code
appended.

This per-program copy of global subprog code *and* associated func_info
.BTF.ext information, pointing to FUNC -> FUNC_PROTO BTF type chain
allows libbpf to simulate __arg_ctx behavior transparently, even if the
kernel doesn't yet support __arg_ctx annotation natively.

The idea is straightforward: each time we append global subprog's code
and func_info information, we adjust its FUNC -> FUNC_PROTO type
information, if necessary (that is, libbpf can detect the presence of
btf_decl_tag("arg:ctx") just like BPF verifier would do it).

The rest is just mechanical and somewhat painful BTF manipulation code.
It's painful because we need to clone FUNC -> FUNC_PROTO, instead of
reusing it, as same FUNC -> FUNC_PROTO chain might be used by another
main BPF program within the same BPF object, so we can't just modify it
in-place (and cloning BTF types within the same struct btf object is
painful due to constant memory invalidation, see comments in code).
Uploaded BPF object's BTF information has to work for all BPF
programs at the same time.

Once we have FUNC -> FUNC_PROTO clones, we make sure that instead of
using some `void *ctx` parameter definition, we have an expected `struct
bpf_perf_event_data *ctx` definition (as far as BPF verifier and kernel
is concerned), which will mark it as context for BPF verifier. Same
global subprog relocated and copied into another main BPF program will
get different type information according to main program's type. It all
works out in the end in a completely transparent way for end user.

Libbpf maintains internal program type -> expected context struct name
mapping internally. Note, not all BPF program types have named context
struct, so this approach won't work for such programs (just like it
didn't before __arg_ctx). So native __arg_ctx is still important to have
in kernel to have generic context support across all BPF program types.

Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240104013847.3875810-8-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-01-04 19:15:17 -05:00
2022-08-24 21:51:42 -07:00
2022-01-24 15:37:36 -08:00
2021-02-22 11:35:49 -08:00

libbpf Github Actions Builds & Tests Coverity CodeQL OSS-Fuzz Status Read the Docs

This is the official home of the libbpf library.

Please use this Github repository for building and packaging libbpf and when using it in your projects through Git submodule.

Libbpf authoritative source code is developed as part of bpf-next Linux source tree under tools/lib/bpf subdirectory and is periodically synced to Github. As such, all the libbpf changes should be sent to BPF mailing list, please don't open PRs here unless you are changing Github-specific parts of libbpf (e.g., Github-specific Makefile).

Libbpf and general BPF usage questions

Libbpf documentation can be found here. It's an ongoing effort and has ways to go, but please take a look and consider contributing as well.

Please check out libbpf-bootstrap and the companion blog post for the examples of building BPF applications with libbpf. libbpf-tools are also a good source of the real-world libbpf-based tracing tools.

See also "BPF CO-RE reference guide" for the coverage of practical aspects of building BPF CO-RE applications and "BPF CO-RE" for general introduction into BPF portability issues and BPF CO-RE origins.

All general BPF questions, including kernel functionality, libbpf APIs and their application, should be sent to bpf@vger.kernel.org mailing list. You can subscribe to it here and search its archive here. Please search the archive before asking new questions. It very well might be that this was already addressed or answered before.

bpf@vger.kernel.org is monitored by many more people and they will happily try to help you with whatever issue you have. This repository's PRs and issues should be opened only for dealing with issues pertaining to specific way this libbpf mirror repo is set up and organized.

Building libbpf

libelf is an internal dependency of libbpf and thus it is required to link against and must be installed on the system for applications to work. pkg-config is used by default to find libelf, and the program called can be overridden with PKG_CONFIG.

If using pkg-config at build time is not desired, it can be disabled by setting NO_PKG_CONFIG=1 when calling make.

To build both static libbpf.a and shared libbpf.so:

$ cd src
$ make

To build only static libbpf.a library in directory build/ and install them together with libbpf headers in a staging directory root/:

$ cd src
$ mkdir build root
$ BUILD_STATIC_ONLY=y OBJDIR=build DESTDIR=root make install

To build both static libbpf.a and shared libbpf.so against a custom libelf dependency installed in /build/root/ and install them together with libbpf headers in a build directory /build/root/:

$ cd src
$ PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/build/root/lib64/pkgconfig DESTDIR=/build/root make install

BPF CO-RE (Compile Once Run Everywhere)

Libbpf supports building BPF CO-RE-enabled applications, which, in contrast to BCC, do not require Clang/LLVM runtime being deployed to target servers and doesn't rely on kernel-devel headers being available.

It does rely on kernel to be built with BTF type information, though. Some major Linux distributions come with kernel BTF already built in:

  • Fedora 31+
  • RHEL 8.2+
  • OpenSUSE Tumbleweed (in the next release, as of 2020-06-04)
  • Arch Linux (from kernel 5.7.1.arch1-1)
  • Manjaro (from kernel 5.4 if compiled after 2021-06-18)
  • Ubuntu 20.10
  • Debian 11 (amd64/arm64)

If your kernel doesn't come with BTF built-in, you'll need to build custom kernel. You'll need:

  • pahole 1.16+ tool (part of dwarves package), which performs DWARF to BTF conversion;
  • kernel built with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=y option;
  • you can check if your kernel has BTF built-in by looking for /sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux file:
$ ls -la /sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux
-r--r--r--. 1 root root 3541561 Jun  2 18:16 /sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux

To develop and build BPF programs, you'll need Clang/LLVM 10+. The following distributions have Clang/LLVM 10+ packaged by default:

  • Fedora 32+
  • Ubuntu 20.04+
  • Arch Linux
  • Ubuntu 20.10 (LLVM 11)
  • Debian 11 (LLVM 11)
  • Alpine 3.13+

Otherwise, please make sure to update it on your system.

The following resources are useful to understand what BPF CO-RE is and how to use it:

Distributions

Distributions packaging libbpf from this mirror:

Benefits of packaging from the mirror over packaging from kernel sources:

  • Consistent versioning across distributions.
  • No ties to any specific kernel, transparent handling of older kernels. Libbpf is designed to be kernel-agnostic and work across multitude of kernel versions. It has built-in mechanisms to gracefully handle older kernels, that are missing some of the features, by working around or gracefully degrading functionality. Thus libbpf is not tied to a specific kernel version and can/should be packaged and versioned independently.
  • Continuous integration testing via GitHub Actions.
  • Static code analysis via LGTM and Coverity.

Package dependencies of libbpf, package names may vary across distros:

  • zlib
  • libelf

libbpf distro packaging status

bpf-next to Github sync

All the gory details of syncing can be found in scripts/sync-kernel.sh script. See SYNC.md for instruction.

Some header files in this repo (include/linux/*.h) are reduced versions of their counterpart files at bpf-next's tools/include/linux/*.h to make compilation successful.

License

This work is dual-licensed under BSD 2-clause license and GNU LGPL v2.1 license. You can choose between one of them if you use this work.

SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause OR LGPL-2.1

Description
Automated upstream mirror for libbpf stand-alone build.
Readme 13 MiB
Languages
C 98.3%
Shell 1.4%
Makefile 0.3%