Magnus Karlsson 658b107d4d selftests/xsk: transmit and receive multi-buffer packets
Add the ability to send and receive packets that are larger than the
size of a umem frame, using the AF_XDP /XDP multi-buffer
support. There are three pieces of code that need to be changed to
achieve this: the Rx path, the Tx path, and the validation logic.

Both the Rx path and Tx could only deal with a single fragment per
packet. The Tx path is extended with a new function called
pkt_nb_frags() that can be used to retrieve the number of fragments a
packet will consume. We then create these many fragments in a loop and
fill the N-1 first ones to the max size limit to use the buffer space
efficiently, and the Nth one with whatever data that is left. This
goes on until we have filled in at the most BATCH_SIZE worth of
descriptors and fragments. If we detect that the next packet would
lead to BATCH_SIZE number of fragments sent being exceeded, we do not
send this packet and finish the batch. This packet is instead sent in
the next iteration of BATCH_SIZE fragments.

For Rx, we loop over all fragments we receive as usual, but for every
descriptor that we receive we call a new validation function called
is_frag_valid() to validate the consistency of this fragment. The code
then checks if the packet continues in the next frame. If so, it loops
over the next packet and performs the same validation. once we have
received the last fragment of the packet we also call the function
is_pkt_valid() to validate the packet as a whole. If we get to the end
of the batch and we are not at the end of the current packet, we back
out the partial packet and end the loop. Once we get into the receive
loop next time, we start over from the beginning of that packet. This
so the code becomes simpler at the cost of some performance.

The validation function is_frag_valid() checks that the sequence and
packet numbers are correct at the start and end of each fragment.

Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230719132421.584801-19-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-08-21 13:27:45 -07:00
2022-08-24 21:51:42 -07:00
2022-01-24 15:37:36 -08:00
2023-05-12 14:29:41 -07:00
2022-04-22 14:30:27 -07:00
2021-02-22 11:35:49 -08:00

libbpf Github Actions Builds & Tests Coverity CodeQL OSS-Fuzz Status Read the Docs

This is the official home of the libbpf library.

Please use this Github repository for building and packaging libbpf and when using it in your projects through Git submodule.

Libbpf authoritative source code is developed as part of bpf-next Linux source tree under tools/lib/bpf subdirectory and is periodically synced to Github. As such, all the libbpf changes should be sent to BPF mailing list, please don't open PRs here unless you are changing Github-specific parts of libbpf (e.g., Github-specific Makefile).

Libbpf and general BPF usage questions

Libbpf documentation can be found here. It's an ongoing effort and has ways to go, but please take a look and consider contributing as well.

Please check out libbpf-bootstrap and the companion blog post for the examples of building BPF applications with libbpf. libbpf-tools are also a good source of the real-world libbpf-based tracing tools.

See also "BPF CO-RE reference guide" for the coverage of practical aspects of building BPF CO-RE applications and "BPF CO-RE" for general introduction into BPF portability issues and BPF CO-RE origins.

All general BPF questions, including kernel functionality, libbpf APIs and their application, should be sent to bpf@vger.kernel.org mailing list. You can subscribe to it here and search its archive here. Please search the archive before asking new questions. It very well might be that this was already addressed or answered before.

bpf@vger.kernel.org is monitored by many more people and they will happily try to help you with whatever issue you have. This repository's PRs and issues should be opened only for dealing with issues pertaining to specific way this libbpf mirror repo is set up and organized.

Building libbpf

libelf is an internal dependency of libbpf and thus it is required to link against and must be installed on the system for applications to work. pkg-config is used by default to find libelf, and the program called can be overridden with PKG_CONFIG.

If using pkg-config at build time is not desired, it can be disabled by setting NO_PKG_CONFIG=1 when calling make.

To build both static libbpf.a and shared libbpf.so:

$ cd src
$ make

To build only static libbpf.a library in directory build/ and install them together with libbpf headers in a staging directory root/:

$ cd src
$ mkdir build root
$ BUILD_STATIC_ONLY=y OBJDIR=build DESTDIR=root make install

To build both static libbpf.a and shared libbpf.so against a custom libelf dependency installed in /build/root/ and install them together with libbpf headers in a build directory /build/root/:

$ cd src
$ PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/build/root/lib64/pkgconfig DESTDIR=/build/root make install

BPF CO-RE (Compile Once Run Everywhere)

Libbpf supports building BPF CO-RE-enabled applications, which, in contrast to BCC, do not require Clang/LLVM runtime being deployed to target servers and doesn't rely on kernel-devel headers being available.

It does rely on kernel to be built with BTF type information, though. Some major Linux distributions come with kernel BTF already built in:

  • Fedora 31+
  • RHEL 8.2+
  • OpenSUSE Tumbleweed (in the next release, as of 2020-06-04)
  • Arch Linux (from kernel 5.7.1.arch1-1)
  • Manjaro (from kernel 5.4 if compiled after 2021-06-18)
  • Ubuntu 20.10
  • Debian 11 (amd64/arm64)

If your kernel doesn't come with BTF built-in, you'll need to build custom kernel. You'll need:

  • pahole 1.16+ tool (part of dwarves package), which performs DWARF to BTF conversion;
  • kernel built with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=y option;
  • you can check if your kernel has BTF built-in by looking for /sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux file:
$ ls -la /sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux
-r--r--r--. 1 root root 3541561 Jun  2 18:16 /sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux

To develop and build BPF programs, you'll need Clang/LLVM 10+. The following distributions have Clang/LLVM 10+ packaged by default:

  • Fedora 32+
  • Ubuntu 20.04+
  • Arch Linux
  • Ubuntu 20.10 (LLVM 11)
  • Debian 11 (LLVM 11)
  • Alpine 3.13+

Otherwise, please make sure to update it on your system.

The following resources are useful to understand what BPF CO-RE is and how to use it:

Distributions

Distributions packaging libbpf from this mirror:

Benefits of packaging from the mirror over packaging from kernel sources:

  • Consistent versioning across distributions.
  • No ties to any specific kernel, transparent handling of older kernels. Libbpf is designed to be kernel-agnostic and work across multitude of kernel versions. It has built-in mechanisms to gracefully handle older kernels, that are missing some of the features, by working around or gracefully degrading functionality. Thus libbpf is not tied to a specific kernel version and can/should be packaged and versioned independently.
  • Continuous integration testing via GitHub Actions.
  • Static code analysis via LGTM and Coverity.

Package dependencies of libbpf, package names may vary across distros:

  • zlib
  • libelf

libbpf distro packaging status

bpf-next to Github sync

All the gory details of syncing can be found in scripts/sync-kernel.sh script. See SYNC.md for instruction.

Some header files in this repo (include/linux/*.h) are reduced versions of their counterpart files at bpf-next's tools/include/linux/*.h to make compilation successful.

License

This work is dual-licensed under BSD 2-clause license and GNU LGPL v2.1 license. You can choose between one of them if you use this work.

SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause OR LGPL-2.1

Description
Automated upstream mirror for libbpf stand-alone build.
Readme 13 MiB
Languages
C 98.3%
Shell 1.4%
Makefile 0.3%