When the BPF ring buffer is full, a new event cannot be recorded until one
or more old events are consumed to make enough space for it. In cases such
as fault diagnostics, where recent events are more useful than older ones,
this mechanism may lead to critical events being lost.
So add overwrite mode for BPF ring buffer to address it. In this mode, the
new event overwrites the oldest event when the buffer is full.
The basic idea is as follows:
1. producer_pos tracks the next position to record new event. When there
is enough free space, producer_pos is simply advanced by producer to
make space for the new event.
2. To avoid waiting for consumer when the buffer is full, a new variable,
overwrite_pos, is introduced for producer. It points to the oldest event
committed in the buffer. It is advanced by producer to discard one or more
oldest events to make space for the new event when the buffer is full.
3. pending_pos tracks the oldest event to be committed. pending_pos is never
passed by producer_pos, so multiple producers never write to the same
position at the same time.
The following example diagrams show how it works in a 4096-byte ring buffer.
1. At first, {producer,overwrite,pending,consumer}_pos are all set to 0.
0 512 1024 1536 2048 2560 3072 3584 4096
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| |
| |
| |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
^
|
|
producer_pos = 0
overwrite_pos = 0
pending_pos = 0
consumer_pos = 0
2. Now reserve a 512-byte event A.
There is enough free space, so A is allocated at offset 0. And producer_pos
is advanced to 512, the end of A. Since A is not submitted, the BUSY bit is
set.
0 512 1024 1536 2048 2560 3072 3584 4096
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| | |
| A | |
| [BUSY] | |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
^ ^
| |
| |
| producer_pos = 512
|
overwrite_pos = 0
pending_pos = 0
consumer_pos = 0
3. Reserve event B, size 1024.
B is allocated at offset 512 with BUSY bit set, and producer_pos is advanced
to the end of B.
0 512 1024 1536 2048 2560 3072 3584 4096
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| | | |
| A | B | |
| [BUSY] | [BUSY] | |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
^ ^
| |
| |
| producer_pos = 1536
|
overwrite_pos = 0
pending_pos = 0
consumer_pos = 0
4. Reserve event C, size 2048.
C is allocated at offset 1536, and producer_pos is advanced to 3584.
0 512 1024 1536 2048 2560 3072 3584 4096
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| | | | |
| A | B | C | |
| [BUSY] | [BUSY] | [BUSY] | |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
^ ^
| |
| |
| producer_pos = 3584
|
overwrite_pos = 0
pending_pos = 0
consumer_pos = 0
5. Submit event A.
The BUSY bit of A is cleared. B becomes the oldest event to be committed, so
pending_pos is advanced to 512, the start of B.
0 512 1024 1536 2048 2560 3072 3584 4096
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| | | | |
| A | B | C | |
| | [BUSY] | [BUSY] | |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
^ ^ ^
| | |
| | |
| pending_pos = 512 producer_pos = 3584
|
overwrite_pos = 0
consumer_pos = 0
6. Submit event B.
The BUSY bit of B is cleared, and pending_pos is advanced to the start of C,
which is now the oldest event to be committed.
0 512 1024 1536 2048 2560 3072 3584 4096
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| | | | |
| A | B | C | |
| | | [BUSY] | |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
^ ^ ^
| | |
| | |
| pending_pos = 1536 producer_pos = 3584
|
overwrite_pos = 0
consumer_pos = 0
7. Reserve event D, size 1536 (3 * 512).
There are 2048 bytes not being written between producer_pos (currently 3584)
and pending_pos, so D is allocated at offset 3584, and producer_pos is advanced
by 1536 (from 3584 to 5120).
Since event D will overwrite all bytes of event A and the first 512 bytes of
event B, overwrite_pos is advanced to the start of event C, the oldest event
that is not overwritten.
0 512 1024 1536 2048 2560 3072 3584 4096
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| | | | |
| D End | | C | D Begin|
| [BUSY] | | [BUSY] | [BUSY] |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
^ ^ ^
| | |
| | pending_pos = 1536
| | overwrite_pos = 1536
| |
| producer_pos=5120
|
consumer_pos = 0
8. Reserve event E, size 1024.
Although there are 512 bytes not being written between producer_pos and
pending_pos, E cannot be reserved, as it would overwrite the first 512
bytes of event C, which is still being written.
9. Submit event C and D.
pending_pos is advanced to the end of D.
0 512 1024 1536 2048 2560 3072 3584 4096
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| | | | |
| D End | | C | D Begin|
| | | | |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
^ ^ ^
| | |
| | overwrite_pos = 1536
| |
| producer_pos=5120
| pending_pos=5120
|
consumer_pos = 0
The performance data for overwrite mode will be provided in a follow-up
patch that adds overwrite-mode benchmarks.
A sample of performance data for non-overwrite mode, collected on an x86_64
CPU and an arm64 CPU, before and after this patch, is shown below. As we can
see, no obvious performance regression occurs.
- x86_64 (AMD EPYC 9654)
Before:
Ringbuf, multi-producer contention
==================================
rb-libbpf nr_prod 1 11.623 ± 0.027M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 2 15.812 ± 0.014M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 3 7.871 ± 0.003M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 4 6.703 ± 0.001M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 8 2.896 ± 0.002M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 12 2.054 ± 0.002M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 16 1.864 ± 0.002M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 20 1.580 ± 0.002M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 24 1.484 ± 0.002M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 28 1.369 ± 0.002M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 32 1.316 ± 0.001M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 36 1.272 ± 0.002M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 40 1.239 ± 0.001M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 44 1.226 ± 0.002M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 48 1.213 ± 0.001M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 52 1.193 ± 0.001M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
After:
Ringbuf, multi-producer contention
==================================
rb-libbpf nr_prod 1 11.845 ± 0.036M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 2 15.889 ± 0.006M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 3 8.155 ± 0.002M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 4 6.708 ± 0.001M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 8 2.918 ± 0.001M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 12 2.065 ± 0.002M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 16 1.870 ± 0.002M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 20 1.582 ± 0.002M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 24 1.482 ± 0.001M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 28 1.372 ± 0.002M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 32 1.323 ± 0.002M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 36 1.264 ± 0.001M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 40 1.236 ± 0.002M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 44 1.209 ± 0.002M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 48 1.189 ± 0.001M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 52 1.165 ± 0.002M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
- arm64 (HiSilicon Kunpeng 920)
Before:
Ringbuf, multi-producer contention
==================================
rb-libbpf nr_prod 1 11.310 ± 0.623M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 2 9.947 ± 0.004M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 3 6.634 ± 0.011M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 4 4.502 ± 0.003M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 8 3.888 ± 0.003M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 12 3.372 ± 0.005M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 16 3.189 ± 0.010M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 20 2.998 ± 0.006M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 24 3.086 ± 0.018M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 28 2.845 ± 0.004M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 32 2.815 ± 0.008M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 36 2.771 ± 0.009M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 40 2.814 ± 0.011M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 44 2.752 ± 0.006M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 48 2.695 ± 0.006M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 52 2.710 ± 0.006M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
After:
Ringbuf, multi-producer contention
==================================
rb-libbpf nr_prod 1 11.283 ± 0.550M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 2 9.993 ± 0.003M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 3 6.898 ± 0.006M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 4 5.257 ± 0.001M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 8 3.830 ± 0.005M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 12 3.528 ± 0.013M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 16 3.265 ± 0.018M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 20 2.990 ± 0.007M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 24 2.929 ± 0.014M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 28 2.898 ± 0.010M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 32 2.818 ± 0.006M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 36 2.789 ± 0.012M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 40 2.770 ± 0.006M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 44 2.651 ± 0.007M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 48 2.669 ± 0.005M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-libbpf nr_prod 52 2.695 ± 0.009M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20251018035738.4039621-2-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com
libbpf

This is the official home of the libbpf library.
Please use this Github repository for building and packaging libbpf and when using it in your projects through Git submodule.
Libbpf authoritative source code is developed as part of bpf-next Linux source
tree under
tools/lib/bpf subdirectory and is periodically synced to Github. As such, all the
libbpf changes should be sent to BPF mailing list,
please don't open PRs here unless you are changing Github-specific parts of libbpf
(e.g., Github-specific Makefile).
Libbpf and general BPF usage questions
Libbpf documentation can be found here. It's an ongoing effort and has ways to go, but please take a look and consider contributing as well.
Please check out libbpf-bootstrap and the companion blog post for the examples of building BPF applications with libbpf. libbpf-tools are also a good source of the real-world libbpf-based tracing tools.
See also "BPF CO-RE reference guide" for the coverage of practical aspects of building BPF CO-RE applications and "BPF CO-RE" for general introduction into BPF portability issues and BPF CO-RE origins.
All general BPF questions, including kernel functionality, libbpf APIs and their application, should be sent to bpf@vger.kernel.org mailing list. You can subscribe to it here and search its archive here. Please search the archive before asking new questions. It very well might be that this was already addressed or answered before.
bpf@vger.kernel.org is monitored by many more people and they will happily try to help you with whatever issue you have. This repository's PRs and issues should be opened only for dealing with issues pertaining to specific way this libbpf mirror repo is set up and organized.
Building libbpf
libelf is an internal dependency of libbpf and thus it is required to link
against and must be installed on the system for applications to work.
pkg-config is used by default to find libelf, and the program called can be
overridden with PKG_CONFIG.
If using pkg-config at build time is not desired, it can be disabled by
setting NO_PKG_CONFIG=1 when calling make.
To build both static libbpf.a and shared libbpf.so:
$ cd src
$ make
To build only static libbpf.a library in directory build/ and install them together with libbpf headers in a staging directory root/:
$ cd src
$ mkdir build root
$ BUILD_STATIC_ONLY=y OBJDIR=build DESTDIR=root make install
To build both static libbpf.a and shared libbpf.so against a custom libelf dependency installed in /build/root/ and install them together with libbpf headers in a build directory /build/root/:
$ cd src
$ PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/build/root/lib64/pkgconfig DESTDIR=/build/root make install
BPF CO-RE (Compile Once – Run Everywhere)
Libbpf supports building BPF CO-RE-enabled applications, which, in contrast to BCC, do not require Clang/LLVM runtime being deployed to target servers and doesn't rely on kernel-devel headers being available.
It does rely on kernel to be built with BTF type information, though. Some major Linux distributions come with kernel BTF already built in:
- Fedora 31+
- RHEL 8.2+
- OpenSUSE Tumbleweed (in the next release, as of 2020-06-04)
- Arch Linux (from kernel 5.7.1.arch1-1)
- Manjaro (from kernel 5.4 if compiled after 2021-06-18)
- Ubuntu 20.10
- Debian 11 (amd64/arm64)
If your kernel doesn't come with BTF built-in, you'll need to build custom kernel. You'll need:
pahole1.16+ tool (part ofdwarvespackage), which performs DWARF to BTF conversion;- kernel built with
CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=yoption; - you can check if your kernel has BTF built-in by looking for
/sys/kernel/btf/vmlinuxfile:
$ ls -la /sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux
-r--r--r--. 1 root root 3541561 Jun 2 18:16 /sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux
To develop and build BPF programs, you'll need Clang/LLVM 10+. The following distributions have Clang/LLVM 10+ packaged by default:
- Fedora 32+
- Ubuntu 20.04+
- Arch Linux
- Ubuntu 20.10 (LLVM 11)
- Debian 11 (LLVM 11)
- Alpine 3.13+
Otherwise, please make sure to update it on your system.
The following resources are useful to understand what BPF CO-RE is and how to use it:
- BPF CO-RE reference guide
- BPF Portability and CO-RE
- HOWTO: BCC to libbpf conversion
- libbpf-tools in BCC repo contain lots of real-world tools converted from BCC to BPF CO-RE. Consider converting some more to both contribute to the BPF community and gain some more experience with it.
Distributions
Distributions packaging libbpf from this mirror:
Benefits of packaging from the mirror over packaging from kernel sources:
- Consistent versioning across distributions.
- No ties to any specific kernel, transparent handling of older kernels. Libbpf is designed to be kernel-agnostic and work across multitude of kernel versions. It has built-in mechanisms to gracefully handle older kernels, that are missing some of the features, by working around or gracefully degrading functionality. Thus libbpf is not tied to a specific kernel version and can/should be packaged and versioned independently.
- Continuous integration testing via GitHub Actions.
- Static code analysis via LGTM and Coverity.
Package dependencies of libbpf, package names may vary across distros:
- zlib
- libelf
bpf-next to Github sync
All the gory details of syncing can be found in scripts/sync-kernel.sh
script. See SYNC.md for instruction.
Some header files in this repo (include/linux/*.h) are reduced versions of
their counterpart files at
bpf-next's
tools/include/linux/*.h to make compilation successful.
License
This work is dual-licensed under BSD 2-clause license and GNU LGPL v2.1 license. You can choose between one of them if you use this work.
SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause OR LGPL-2.1